Safety and efficacy of flumazenil in reversing conscious sedation in the emergency department

被引:14
作者
Chudnofsky, CR
机构
[1] University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, SL Joseph's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI
[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
[4] Department of Emergency Medicine, Miericordiü Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
[5] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
[6] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
[7] Department of Emergency Medicine, Charlotte, NC
[8] Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
[9] Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolina's Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
[10] Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
[11] Department of Emergency Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI
[12] Emergency Services, Flint
[13] Department of Emergency Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI 48503, One Hurley Plaza
关键词
flumazenil; conscious sedation; deep sedation; benzodiazepine; benzodiazepine antagonist; clinical procedure; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03657.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flumazenil vs placebo in reversing fentanyl and midazolam-induced conscious sedation in ED patients undergoing a short, painful procedure. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 9 university-affiliated teaching hospitals. Patients >18 years of age requiring conscious sedation for a painful procedure expected to last <20 minutes were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients received 2 mu g/kg of fentanyl, followed by midazolam titrated to the desired level of sedation, Patients were then randomized to receive either flumazenil or placebo in a 3:1 ratio (flumazenil:placebo). Vital signs, O-2 saturation, and alertness were recorded at regular intervals. Prior to ED release, patients were asked to rate the amount of discomfort they experienced and the level of relaxation achieved on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS, They also were questioned about their recall for the procedure and satisfaction with the drug regimen. Physicians also rated their satisfaction with the drug regimen on a IO-cm VAS. Results: Overall, 133 patients received flumazenil and 46 patients received placebo. Patients in the 2 groups received similar doses of midazolam. The patients who received flumazenil returned to baseline alertness earlier (11.1 min vs 24.8 min, p < 0.001) and at a faster rate than did the patients given placebo. Actual intervals from procedure completion until release from the ED did not differ between the 2 groups (98.2 +/- 3.6 min flumazenil vs 96.9 +/- 5.8 min placebo; p = 0.89). The amounts of discomfort experienced, levels of relaxation achieved, recalls for the procedure, and both patient and physician satisfactions were also similar for the 2 groups. There were no serious adverse effects related to the study drug, and minor adverse effects were similar for the 2 groups. Conclusion: Flumazenil is safe and efficacious in reversing midazolam-induced sedation in ED patients given a combination of fentanyl and midazolam to facilitate the performance of a short, painful procedure, The patients given flumazenil returned to baseline alertness earlier and at a faster rate than did the patients given placebo. However, flumazenil did not alter the actual interval from procedure completion until ED release.
引用
收藏
页码:944 / 950
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   FLUMAZENIL IN THE OUTPATIENT - A STUDY FOLLOWING MIDAZOLAM AS SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
ANDREWS, PJD ;
WRIGHT, DJ ;
LAMONT, MC .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (06) :445-448
[2]   THE ROLE OF MIDAZOLAM AND FLUMAZENIL IN UROLOGY [J].
BIRCH, BRP ;
ANSON, K ;
GELISTER, J ;
PARKER, C ;
MILLER, RA .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 34 :25-32
[3]   SPEED OF REVERSAL OF MIDAZOLAM-INDUCED RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION BY FLUMAZENIL - A STUDY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING UPPER GI ENDOSCOPY [J].
CARTER, AS ;
BELL, GD ;
COADY, T ;
LEE, J ;
MORDEN, A .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 34 :59-64
[4]  
CHUDNOFSKY CR, 1997, IN PRESS EMERGENCY M
[5]  
DUNK AA, 1990, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V4, P35
[6]   TIME COURSE OF ANTAGONISM OF SEDATIVE AND AMNESIC EFFECTS OF DIAZEPAM BY FLUMAZENIL [J].
GHONEIM, MM ;
DEMBO, JB ;
BLOCK, RI .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 70 (06) :899-904
[7]  
*HOFFM LAROCH, 1992, CLIN EV MAZ DAT FIL
[8]   FLUMAZENIL IN TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA USING MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL [J].
KLAUSEN, NO ;
JUHL, O ;
SORENSEN, J ;
FERGUSON, AH ;
NEUMANN, PB .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 32 (05) :409-412
[9]   METHOHEXITAL VS MIDAZOLAM FLUMAZENIL ANESTHESIA DURING LARYNGOSCOPY UNDER JET VENTILATION [J].
KULKA, PJ ;
LAUVEN, PM ;
SCHUTTLER, J ;
APFFELSTAEDT, C .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 34 :90-95
[10]   THE USE OF MIDAZOLAM AND FLUMAZENIL IN CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES [J].
MARTY, J ;
NITENBERG, A .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 34 :33-34