Hydrologic response of grasslands: Effects of grazing, interactive infiltration, and scale

被引:29
作者
Fiedler, FR [1 ]
Frasier, GW
Ramirez, JA
Ahuja, LR
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Civil Engn, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Crops Res Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
rangeland; hydrologic aspects; infiltration;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:4(293)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 [建筑学];
摘要
Data collected at two measurement scales from a semiarid grassland are presented and analyzed to explore the hydrologic effects of grazing, interactions between overland flow and infiltration, and scale issues. Rainfall-runoff simulations were used to quantify the areal (3 by 10 m plot scale) response, and small-diameter (9 cm) disk infiltrometers were used to estimate point-scale hydraulic conductivity of bare and vegetated soil. Plot-scale data show that grazing increases runoff overall, a common result, but infiltrometer measurements indicate that only the point-scale hydraulic conductivity of vegetated soil is changed by grazing. In light of this and the well-known relationship between microtopography and vegetation in semiarid grasslands, we hypothesize that small-scale surface interactions (in particular, the so-called run-on phenomenon) are a significant component of the observed effects of grazing, as well as a factor in the hydrologic response of grasslands. Results obtained from high-resolution numerical simulations support this hypothesis. This phenomenon is not captured by classical infiltration theory or by the usual methods of statistical parameterization. In general, interactions are more likely to be important as spatial variability increases, and the relative importance of these interactions will be a function of the spatial structure of the variability and the hydrodynamics of overland flow, as controlled by microtopography.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 301
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
SIMPLE FIELD METHOD FOR DETERMINING UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY [J].
ANKENY, MD ;
AHMED, M ;
KASPAR, TC ;
HORTON, R .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1991, 55 (02) :467-470
[2]
[Anonymous], 1996, HYDROLOGICAL CLIMATO
[3]
VARIABILITY OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN 2 SUBSURFACE HORIZONS OF 2 SILT LOAM SOILS [J].
BAKER, FG ;
BOUMA, J .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1976, 40 (02) :219-222
[4]
Bloschl G., 1995, Scale issues in hydrological modelling., P71
[5]
Close KR, 1998, T ASAE, V41, P995, DOI 10.13031/2013.17272
[6]
On the interaction between infiltration and Hortonian runoff [J].
Corradini, C ;
Morbidelli, R ;
Melone, F .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1998, 204 (1-4) :52-67
[7]
UNSATURATED FLOW IN SPATIALLY-VARIABLE FIELDS .1. DERIVATION OF MODELS OF INFILTRATION AND REDISTRIBUTION [J].
DAGAN, G ;
BRESLER, E .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1983, 19 (02) :413-420
[8]
EFFECTS OF RAINFALL, VEGETATION, AND MICROTOPOGRAPHY ON INFILTRATION AND RUNOFF [J].
DUNNE, T ;
ZHANG, WH ;
AUBRY, BF .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1991, 27 (09) :2271-2285
[9]
Fiedler FR, 2000, INT J NUMER METH FL, V32, P219, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(20000130)32:2<219::AID-FLD936>3.0.CO
[10]
2-J