Users' Relevance Criteria for Evaluating Answers in a Social Q&A Site

被引:113
作者
Kim, Soojung [1 ]
Oh, Sanghee [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Coll Informat Studies, Hornbake S Wing, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Informat & Lib Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2009年 / 60卷 / 04期
关键词
OF-THE-LITERATURE; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; FRAMEWORK; RETRIEVAL; THINKING; NOTION;
D O I
10.1002/asi.21026
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study examines the criteria questioners use to select the best answers in a social Q&A site (Yahoo! Answers) within the theoretical framework of relevance research. A social Q&A site is a novel environment where people voluntarily ask and answer questions. In Yahoo! Answers, the questioner selects the answer that best satisfies his or her question and leaves comments on it. Under the assumption that the comments reflect the reasons why questioners select particular answers as the best, this study analyzed 2,140 comments collected from Yahoo! Answers during December 2007. The content analysis identified 23 individual relevance criteria in six classes: Content, Cognitive, Utility, Information Sources, Extrinsic, and Socioemotional. A major finding is that the selection criteria used in a social Q&A site have considerable overlap with many relevance criteria uncovered in previous relevance studies, but that the scope of socioemotional criteria has been expanded to include the social aspect of this environment. Another significant finding is that the relative importance of individual criteria varies according to topic categories. Socioemotional criteria are popular in discussion-oriented categories, content-oriented criteria in topic-oriented categories, and utility criteria in self-help categories. This study generalizes previous relevance studies to a new environment by going beyond an academic setting.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 727
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, DOI DOI 10.1145/1367497.1367587
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIOMETRICS
[3]  
BARRY CL, 1994, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V45, P149, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<149::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-J
[5]   Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison [J].
Barry, CL ;
Schamber, L .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 1998, 34 (2-3) :219-236
[6]   The concept of relevance in IR [J].
Borlund, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (10) :913-925
[7]   Users' relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history [J].
Choi, Y ;
Rasmussen, EM .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2002, 38 (05) :695-726
[8]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[9]   Dimensions of relevance [J].
Cosijn, E ;
Ingwersen, P .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2000, 36 (04) :533-550
[10]  
Gazan R., 2007, P 69 ANN M AM SOC IN, V43, P1