Urinary excretion of phenols as an indicator of occupational exposure in the coke-plant industry

被引:19
作者
Bieniek, G
机构
[1] Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Silesian Medical Academy
关键词
mixed exposure; phenols; biological monitoring;
D O I
10.1007/s004200050227
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: In the present study the relationship between the level of exposure to o-cresol and of 2,4- +2,5- 3,4-, and 3,5-xylenols and the urinary excretion of their metabolites was examined. The mixed exposure to phenolic derivatives of exposed workers during their work shift was monitored by personal air sampling of the breathing-zone air and by measurements of phenol, o-cresol, and xylenol isomer concentrations in shift-end urine. Methods: The study subjects were 76 men working at a coke plant who were 22-58 years old and 34 nonexposed subjects. Concentrations of phenolic compounds were determined in the breathing-zone air during the work shift. whereas concentrations of phenol, cresol, and xylenol isomers were measured in urine collected after the work shift. Concentrations of phenols in air and urine were determined by gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection. Urine samples were extracted after acid hydrolysis of glucuronides and sulfates by solid-phase extraction. The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method was applied to identify metabolites in urine samples. Results: The time-weighted average concentrations of phenol, cresol, and xylenol isomers detected in breathing-zone air showed that the exposure level of the workers was relatively low. The geometric mean values were as follows: 0.26 mg/m(3) for phenol, 0.09 mg/m(3) for o-cresol, 0.13 mg/m(3) for p- and m-cresol, and 0.02-0.04 mg/m(3) for xylenols at the tar-distillation process. Corresponding urinary concentrations were 10.39, 0.53, and 0.25-0.88 mg/g creatinine for phenol, o-cresol, and xylenol isomers, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the o-cresol and 2,4-, 2,5-: 3,4-, and 3,5-xylenol concentrations measured in urine and in the breathing-zone air were statistically significant, varying: in the range of 0.54-0.74 for xylenol isomers and being 0.69 for o-cresol. Conclusion: We have found that the presence of o-cresol and xylenol isomers in urine can be used as a biomarker for phenol exposure. Analysis performed on workers at the tar-distillation process showed that they were exposed to relatively low concentrations of phenolic compounds.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1991, THRESH LIM VAL CHEM
[2]   OCCUPATIONAL CHRONIC EXPOSURE TO ORGANIC-SOLVENTS .11. ALKYLBENZENE EXPOSURE OF VARNISH WORKERS - EFFECTS ON HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM [J].
ANGERER, J ;
WULF, H .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1985, 56 (04) :307-321
[3]   BIOMONITORING OF OCCUPATIONAL TOLUENE EXPOSURE [J].
APOSTOLI, P ;
BRUGNONE, F ;
PERBELLINI, L ;
COCHEO, V ;
BELLOMO, ML ;
SILVESTRI, R .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1982, 50 (02) :153-168
[4]   CONCENTRATIONS OF PHENOL, O-CRESOL, AND 2,5-XYLENOL IN THE URINE OF WORKERS EMPLOYED IN THE DISTILLATION OF THE PHENOLIC FRACTION OF TAR [J].
BIENIEK, G .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1994, 51 (05) :354-356
[5]   Simultaneous determination of phenol, cresol, xylenol isomers and naphthols in urine by capillary gas chromatography [J].
Bieniek, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 1996, 682 (01) :167-172
[6]   HIPPURIC-ACID AND ORTHO-CRESOL AS BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO TOLUENE [J].
DEROSA, E ;
BARTOLUCCI, GB ;
SIGON, M ;
CALLEGARO, R ;
PERBELLINI, L ;
BRUGNONE, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1987, 11 (05) :529-537
[7]  
DOSSING M, 1983, BRIT J IND MED, V40, P470
[8]  
Fiege H, 1987, ULLMANNS ENCY IND CH, P25
[9]  
GSPAN P, 1984, STAUB REINHALT LUFT, V44, P314
[10]   SAMPLING OF GASEOUS-POLLUTANTS ON SILICA-GEL WITH 1400 MG TUBES [J].
GUENIER, JP ;
LHUILLIER, F ;
MULLER, J .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1986, 30 (01) :103-114