The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments

被引:1147
作者
Austin, Peter C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
propensity score; observational study; propensity score matching; inverse probability of treatment weighting; survival analysis; event history analysis; confounding; marginal effects; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; INVERSE PROBABILITY; UNTREATED SUBJECTS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; COVARIATE; BALANCE; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; ABILITY; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1002/sim.5984
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Propensity score methods are increasingly being used to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. In medical and epidemiological studies, outcomes are frequently time-to-event in nature. Propensity-score methods are often applied incorrectly when estimating the effect of treatment on time-to-event outcomes. This article describes how two different propensity score methods (matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting) can be used to estimate the measures of effect that are frequently reported in randomized controlled trials: (i) marginal survival curves, which describe survival in the population if all subjects were treated or if all subjects were untreated; and (ii) marginal hazard ratios. The use of these propensity score methods allows one to replicate the measures of effect that are commonly reported in randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: both absolute and relative reductions in the probability of an event occurring can be determined. We also provide guidance on variable selection for the propensity score model, highlight methods for assessing the balance of baseline covariates between treated and untreated subjects, and describe the implementation of a sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of unmeasured confounding variables on the estimated treatment effect when outcomes are time-to-event in nature. The methods in the paper are illustrated by estimating the effect of discharge statin prescribing on the risk of death in a sample of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. In this tutorial article, we describe and illustrate all the steps necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the effect of treatment on time-to-event outcomes. (c) 2013 The authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / 1258
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MODELING SURVIVAL DA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PloS One
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Springer Series in Statistics
[4]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY CARDIAC CARE
[5]   A comparison of propensity score methods: A case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use [J].
Austin, PC ;
Mamdani, MM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (12) :2084-2106
[6]  
Austin PC, 2008, STAT MED, V27, P2037, DOI 10.1002/sim.3150
[7]   Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvement [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 134 (05) :1128-U7
[8]   A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) :734-753
[9]   Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: A Monte Carlo study (p n/a) [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Normand, Sharon-Lise T. ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (16) :3208-3210
[10]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (16) :2837-2849