Habitat structure, trophic structure and ecosystem function: interactive effects in a bromeliad-insect community

被引:106
作者
Srivastava, Diane S.
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Zool, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Biodivers Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
aquatic insects; decomposition; habitat size; habitat complexity; predation;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-006-0467-3
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Although previous studies have shown that ecosystem functions are affected by either trophic structure or habitat structure, there has been little consideration of their combined effects. Such interactions may be particularly important in systems where habitat and trophic structure covary. I use the aquatic insects in bromeliads to examine the combined effects of trophic structure and habitat structure on a key ecosystem function: detrital processing. In Costa Rican bromeliads, trophic structure naturally covaries with both habitat complexity and habitat size, precluding any observational analysis of interactions between factors. I therefore designed mesocosms that allowed each factor to be manipulated separately. Increases in mesocosm complexity reduced predator (damselfly larva) efficiency, resulting in high detritivore abundances, indirectly increasing detrital processing rates. However, increased complexity also directly reduced the per capita foraging efficiency of the detritivores. Over short time periods, these trends effectively cancelled each other out in terms of detrital processing. Over longer time periods, more complex patterns emerged. Increases in mesocosm size also reduced both predator efficiency and detritivore efficiency, leading to no net effect on detrital processing. In many systems, ecosystem functions may be impacted by strong interactions between trophic structure and habitat structure, cautioning against examining either effect in isolation.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 504
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Differential effects of habitat complexity, predators and competitors on abundance of juvenile and adult coral reef fishes [J].
Almany, GR .
OECOLOGIA, 2004, 141 (01) :105-113
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, BIODIVERSITY ECOSYST
[3]   Factors influencing community structure in a South American tank bromeliad fauna [J].
Armbruster, P ;
Hutchinson, RA ;
Cotgreave, P .
OIKOS, 2002, 96 (02) :225-234
[4]   Separating the elements of habitat structure: independent effects of habitat complexity and structural components on rocky intertidal gastropods [J].
Beck, MW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2000, 249 (01) :29-49
[5]  
Beukera JS, 1997, OECOLOGIA, V114, P50, DOI DOI 10.1007/S004420050419)
[6]   RESOURCE LIMITATION, HABITAT SEGREGATION, AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS OF BRITISH TREE-HOLE MOSQUITOS IN NATURE [J].
BRADSHAW, WE ;
HOLZAPFEL, CM .
OECOLOGIA, 1992, 90 (02) :227-237
[7]   DROUGHT AND THE ORGANIZATION OF TREE-HOLE MOSQUITO COMMUNITIES [J].
BRADSHAW, WE ;
HOLZAPFEL, CM .
OECOLOGIA, 1988, 74 (04) :507-514
[8]   Human demography and reserve size predict wildlife extinction in West Africa [J].
Brashares, JS ;
Arcese, P ;
Sam, MK .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 268 (1484) :2473-2478
[9]  
Carpenter SR, 2001, ECOL MONOGR, V71, P163, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0163:TCNALP]2.0.CO
[10]  
2