Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis - Correlation with biopsy and histopathology

被引:244
作者
Kozlowski, Piotr
Chang, Silvia D.
Jones, Edward C.
Berean, Kenneth W.
Chen, Henry
Goldenberg, S. Larry
机构
[1] VGH, Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6H 3Z6, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Surg, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Radiol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[5] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
diffusion-weighted MRI; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; prostate cancer; endorectal coli; histopathology;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20626
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether the combination of diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides higher diagnostic sensitivity for prostate cancer than each technique alone. Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent endorectal MRI on a 1.5T scanner prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)guided biopsies. The average values, of the apparent: diffusion coefficient (ADC, calculated from b-values of 0 and 600), K-trans, v(e), maximum gadolinium (Gd) concentration, onset time, mean,gradient, and maximum enhancement were determined. Correlation with histology was based, on biopsy (six patients) and prostatectomy specimen (eight, patients) results. The Tukey-Kramer test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The average values of all MRI parameters; except v, and maximum Gd concentration, showed significant differences between tumor and normal prostate. The sensitivity and specificity values were respectively 54% (35-72%) and 100% (95-100%) for the ADC data, and 59% (39-77%) and 74% (63-83%) for-the DCE data. When both ADC and DCE results were combined, the sensitivity increased to 87% (68-95%) and specificity decreased to 74% (62-83%). Conclusion: All but two DW-, and DCE-MRI parameters showed significant differences between tumor and normal prostate. Combining both techniques provides better sensitivity, with a small decrease in specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 113
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Barentsz JO, 1999, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V10, P295, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<295::AID-JMRI10>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-Z
[3]   Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier [J].
Chan, I ;
Wells, W ;
Mulkern, RV ;
Haker, S ;
Zhang, JQ ;
Zou, KH ;
Maier, SE ;
Tempany, CMC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) :2390-2398
[4]   Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Jager, GJ ;
Laheij, RJ ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
van Lier, HJ ;
Barentsz, JO .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) :2294-2302
[5]   Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis [J].
Galbraith, SM ;
Lodge, MA ;
Taylor, NJ ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Bentzen, S ;
Stirling, JJ ;
Padhani, AR .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 15 (02) :132-142
[6]   Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Liney, GP ;
Lowry, M ;
Kneeshaw, PJ ;
Turnbull, LW .
BREAST, 2004, 13 (02) :115-121
[7]   Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diflusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Tozer, DJ ;
Liney, GP ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) :1054-1058
[8]  
GIBBS P, 2005, P 13 ANN M ISMRM MIA
[9]  
Haker SJ, 2005, P 13 ANN M ISMRM MIA
[10]   Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue [J].
Hosseinzadeh, K ;
Schwarz, SD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (04) :654-661