Effect of aggregated protein sizes on the flux of protein solution through microporous membranes

被引:8
作者
Higuchi, A
Kyokon, M
Murayama, S
Yokogi, M
Hirasaki, T
Manabe, SI
机构
[1] Seikei Univ, Dept Appl Chem, Tokyo 1808633, Japan
[2] Asahi Med Co Ltd, Int Mkt Dept, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1018482, Japan
[3] Asahikasei Pharma Corp, Planova Div, Miyazaki 8820847, Japan
[4] Fukuoka Womens Univ, Fac Human Environm Sci, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8138529, Japan
关键词
microfiltration; fouling albumin; flow cytometry; light scattering; DNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2004.02.015
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The aggregated size distribution of the gamma-globulin and albumin in aqueous solution was analyzed using flow cytometry, which showed reproducible data compared to conventional light scattering measurements. The addition of NaCl to protein solution effectively reduced the aggregated sizes of proteins in the solution. DNase treatment in the protein solution was also found to effectively reduce the size of aggregated proteins. Microfiltration of an albumin solution was investigated through regenerated cellulose virus removal membranes with different nominal pore sizes (r = 15, 35 and 75 nm). Membranes with 35 nm nominal pore sizes were effective in enhancing the flux of the microfiltration of an albumin solution containing NaCl or containing NaCl and treated with Micrococcal nuclease (DNase). This is thought to be due to the similar size of the pores of the Planova 35N membranes and the small aggregated albumin. DNA rejection was investigated by evaluating the permeation of albumin solutions containing 0 or 0.15 mol/l NaCl and/or treated with 15 units of Micrococcal nuclease. The addition of NaCl and/or treatment of Micrococcal nuclease was effective in reducing the DNA concentration in the albumin solution after microfiltration of the solution using r = 15 nm membranes as compared to using membranes with larger pore sizes (r = 35 and 75 nm). (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 144
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   DIAGNOSIS OF MEMBRANE FOULING USING A ROTATING ANNULAR FILTER .1. CELL-CULTURE MEDIA [J].
BELFORT, G ;
PIMBLEY, JM ;
GREINER, A ;
CHUNG, KY .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1993, 77 (01) :1-22
[2]   Fluorescent dye assay for detection of DNA in recombinant protein products [J].
Bolger, R ;
Lenoch, F ;
Allen, E ;
Meiklejohn, B ;
Burke, T .
BIOTECHNIQUES, 1997, 23 (03) :532-&
[3]   QUANTITATION OF DNA AND PROTEIN IMPURITIES IN BIOPHARMACEUTICALS [J].
BRIGGS, J ;
PANFILI, PR .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 63 (09) :850-859
[4]   How slug flow can improve ultrafiltration flux in organic hollow fibres [J].
Cabassud, C ;
Laborie, S ;
Laine, JM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 128 (01) :93-101
[5]   FLUX DECLINE IN BATCH ULTRAFILTRATION - CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION AND CAKE FORMATION [J].
CHOE, TB ;
MASSE, P ;
VERDIER, A ;
CLIFTON, MJ .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1986, 26 (01) :1-15
[6]   GAS-LIQUID 2-PHASE CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION OF BSA AND DEXTRAN SOLUTIONS [J].
CUI, ZF ;
WRIGHT, KIT .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 90 (1-2) :183-189
[7]  
DO DD, 1985, J MEMBRANE SCI, V25, P113, DOI 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80246-X
[8]   THE EFFECT OF PH AND IONIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEIN SOLUTIONS WITH RETENTIVE MEMBRANES [J].
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
SUKI, A .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1983, 16 (DEC) :195-210
[9]  
FANE AG, 1983, J MEMBRANE SCI, V16, P210
[10]   Beer clarification by cross-flow microfiltration: Fouling mechanisms and flux enhancement [J].
Gan, Q ;
Field, RW ;
Bird, MR ;
England, R ;
Howell, JA ;
McKechnie, MT ;
OShaughnessy, CL .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1997, 75 (A1) :3-8