Two morphologically similar biological species: Chondrus pinnulatus and C-armatus (Gigartinaceae, Rhodophyta)

The nature of the relationship between Chondrus pinnulatus (Harvey) Okamura f. pinnulatus and C. pinnulatus f. armatus (Harvey) Yamada et Mikami (Gigartinaceae, Rhodophyta) was investigated by comparative analysis of their biogeography, phenologies, life histories, gross and vegetative morphology, crossability, and upper thermal tolerance. The forma pinnulatus has a more northerly distribution in Japan and adjacent waters, exhibiting adaptation to the cooler regions, whereas the forma armatus has a more southerly range. The latter may be the result of a higher thermal tolerance. Both formae have a Polysiphonia-type life history and are similar in their internal vegetative morphology. They can, however, be distinguished by gross morphology: forma pinnulatus has wide, flattened axes, compressed to flattened ultimate segments and proliferations, while forma armatus has narrow, compressed to subterete axes and subterete to terete ultimate segments and proliferations. These differences persist in laboratory culture. All intraformae crosses were positive, with carpospores from the cross developing into fertile F-1 tetrasporophytes releasing tetraspores that developed into dioecious F-1 gametophytes, the female gametophytes of which formed normal cystocarps. This suggests that members of populations of each forma freely interbreed. Among interformae crosses, only some offspring derived from geographically distant strains bore normal cystocarps in the F-1 female gametophytes. Other crosses showed that interbreeding between populations of these two formae was blocked by various isolating mechanisms: incompatibility, hybrid inviability, and hybrid sterility. Reproductive isolation between f. pinnulatus and f. armatus is virtually complete in wild populations, because hybrid populations have not been found in the wild. In addition, these two entities can be considered biological species that are also referred to the taxonomic species, C. armatus and C. pinnulatus, because they do not overlap with regard to the morphology of the ultimate segments and proliferations. subtle (but significant) gross morphological differences, partial interfertility between the two species, and deleterious hybridization in the area in which they occur sympatrically suggest that their evolutionary divergence was relatively recent.