Safety and efficacy of urapidil and sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies

被引:75
作者
Hirschl, MM [1 ]
Binder, M [1 ]
Bur, A [1 ]
Herkner, H [1 ]
Mullner, M [1 ]
Woisetschlager, C [1 ]
Laggner, AN [1 ]
机构
[1] NEW GEN HOSP,DEPT DERMATOL,A-1090 VIENNA,AUSTRIA
关键词
hypertensive emergencies; urapidil; sodium nitroprusside;
D O I
10.1007/s001340050426
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of urapidil compared to sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Design: randomized, prospective clinical study. Setting: Emergency department in a 2000-bed inner city hospital. Patients: Eighty-one patients with hypertensive emergencies defined as elevation of systolic blood pressure above 200 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure above 110 mmHg plus evidence of end-organ damage were included in the study protocol. The efficacy of therapy was defined as 1) blood pressure reduction below 180/95 mmHg within 90 min and 2) no re-elevation of blood pressure during a 4-h follow-up period in primary responders. The safety of both drugs was defined as the number of minor and major side effects during treatment. Interventions: Patients received either sodium nitroprusside (n = 35; continuous intravenous administration with a starting dose of 0.5 mu g/kg per min; increase in increments of 0.5 mu g/kg per min every 15 min until response to treatment or a maximum of 3 mu g/kg per min) or urapidil (n = 46; intravenous bolus; starting dose: 12.5 mg; repetitive administration of 12.5 mg every 15 min until response or a maximum dose of 75 mg). Measurements and results: Blood pressure was measured every 2.5 min by using a non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure measurement unit. Response to treatment within 90 min was observed in 75 (93 %) patients (urapidil: n = 41 [89 %]; nitroprusside: n = 34 [97 %]; p = 0.18). During the follow-up period 8/34 (24 %) patients in the nitroprusside group and 1/41 (2 %) patients in the urapidil group exhibited blood pressure re-elevation. Major side effects were observed in seven patients receiving nitroprusside and two patients in the urapidil group (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Urapidil is equally effective, compared to sodium nitroprusside, in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Due to a smaller number of adverse events, urapidil is a reasonable alternative to nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 888
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   CYANIDE TOXICITY FOLLOWING NITROPRUSSIDE INDUCED HYPOTENSION [J].
AITKEN, D ;
WEST, D ;
SMITH, F ;
POZNANSKI, W ;
COWAN, J ;
HURTIG, J ;
PETERSON, E ;
BENOIT, B .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1977, 24 (06) :651-660
[2]  
CETNAROWSKI AB, 1986, ANN INTERN MED, V6, P895
[3]   GUIDELINES FOR THE DRUG-TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIVE CRISES [J].
HIRSCHL, MM .
DRUGS, 1995, 50 (06) :991-1000
[4]   MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSIVE EMERGENCIES [J].
KAPLAN, NM .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8933) :1335-1338
[5]  
Michel D, 1990, Fortschr Med, V108, P21
[6]  
NIGHTINGALE SL, 1991, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V265, P847, DOI 10.1001/jama.265.7.847
[7]  
PANACEK EA, 1995, ACAD EMERG MED, V2, P959
[8]   USE OF SODIUM-NITROPRUSSIDE IN POST-CORONARY BYPASS-SURGERY - A PLEA FOR CONSERVATISM [J].
PATEL, CB ;
LABOY, V ;
VENUS, B ;
MATHRU, M ;
WIER, D .
CHEST, 1986, 89 (05) :663-667
[9]   NITROPRUSSIDE-RELATED CYANIDE POISONING - TIME (LONG PAST DUE) FOR URGENT, EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS [J].
ROBIN, ED ;
MCCAULEY, R .
CHEST, 1992, 102 (06) :1842-1845
[10]  
1993, ARCH INTERN MED, V153, P154