Inhibition of DNA-double strand break repair by antimony compounds

被引:38
作者
Takahashi, S
Sato, H
Kubota, Y
Utsumi, H
Bedford, JS
Okayasu, R
机构
[1] Natl Inst Radiol Sci, Environm & Toxicol Res Grp, Inage Ku, Chiba 2638555, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Inst Res Reactor, Kumatori, Osaka 5900494, Japan
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Radiol Hlth Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
DNA damage; radiation; repair; antimony; genotoxicity;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00401-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), induced by gamma-irradiation in Chinese hamster ovary cells, were used to examine whether antimony compounds affect the repair of DNA damage. The cells were first incubated with antimony trichloride or antimony potassium tartrate (both Sb(III)) for 2 It, and then irradiated with gamma-rays at a dose of 40 Gy. The DNA DSB was quantified with pulsed field gel electrophoresis immediately after irradiation (non-repair group) as well as at 30 min post-irradiation (repair group). The degree of repair inhibition was determined by the differences in the amount of DNA DSB between non-repair and repair groups. Both antimony compounds inhibited repair of DNA DSB in a dose dependent manner. In trichloride, 0.2 mM antimony significantly inhibited the rejoining of DSB, while 0.4 mM was necessary in potassium antimony tartrate. The mean lethal doses, Do, for the treatment with antimony trichloride and antimony potassium tartrate, were approximately 0.21 and 0.12 mM, respectively. This indicates that the repair inhibition by antimony trichloride occurred in the dose range near Do, but the antimony potassium tartrate inhibited the repair at doses where most cells lost their proliferating ability. This is the first report to indicate that antimony compounds may inhibit the repair of radiation-induced DNA DSB. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
CASTO BC, 1979, CANCER RES, V39, P193
[2]   An assessment of the genetic toxicology of antimony trioxide [J].
Elliott, BM ;
Mackay, JM ;
Clay, P ;
Ashby, J .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 415 (1-2) :109-117
[3]   Arsenic and antimony: comparative approach on mechanistic toxicology [J].
Gebel, T .
CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 1997, 107 (03) :131-144
[4]   Assessment of a possible genotoxic environmental risk in sheep bred on grounds with strongly elevated contents of mercury, arsenic and antimony [J].
Gebel, T ;
Kevekordes, S ;
Schaefer, J ;
vonPlaten, H ;
Dunkelberg, H .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 368 (3-4) :267-274
[5]  
GURNANI N, 1992, Cytobios, V70, P131
[6]   COMPARISON OF THE CLASTOGENIC EFFECTS OF ANTIMONY TRIOXIDE ON MICE INVIVO FOLLOWING ACUTE AND CHRONIC EXPOSURE [J].
GURNANI, N ;
SHARMA, A ;
TALUKDER, G .
BIOMETALS, 1992, 5 (01) :47-50
[7]   COMPARISON OF CLASTOGENIC EFFECTS OF ANTIMONY AND BISMUTH AS TRIOXIDES ON MICE INVIVO [J].
GURNANI, N ;
SHARMA, A ;
TALUKDER, G .
BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH, 1993, 37 (2-3) :281-292
[8]  
Hartmann A, 1996, ENVIRON MOL MUTAGEN, V27, P98
[9]  
Hartwig A, 1996, ANN CLIN LAB SCI, V26, P31
[10]   Carcinogenicity of metal compounds: possible role of DNA repair inhibition [J].
Hartwig, A .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1998, 103 :235-239