Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma.

被引:756
作者
Hoffman, JR
Mower, WR
Wolfson, AB
Todd, KH
Zucker, MI
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Emergency Med, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Emergency Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM200007133430203
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Because clinicians fear missing occult cervical-spine injuries, they obtain cervical radiographs for nearly all patients who present with blunt trauma. Previous research suggests that a set of clinical criteria (decision instrument) can identify patients who have an extremely low probability of injury and who consequently have no need for imaging studies. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study of such a decision instrument at 21 centers across the United States. The decision instrument required patients to meet five criteria in order to be classified as having a low probability of injury: no midline cervical tenderness, no focal neurologic deficit, normal alertness, no intoxication, and no painful, distracting injury. We examined the performance of the decision instrument in 34,069 patients who underwent radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma. Results: The decision instrument identified all but 8 of the 818 patients who had cervical-spine injury (sensitivity, 99.0 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 98.0 to 99.6 percent]). The negative predictive value was 99.8 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 99.6 to 100 percent), the specificity was 12.9 percent, and the positive predictive value was 2.7 percent. Only two of the patients classified as unlikely to have an injury according to the decision instrument met the preset definition of a clinically significant injury (sensitivity, 99.6 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 98.6 to 100 percent]; negative predictive value, 99.9 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 99.8 to 100 percent]; specificity, 12.9 percent; positive predictive value, 1.9 percent), and only one of these two patients received surgical treatment. According to the results of assessment with the decision instrument, radiographic imaging could have been avoided in the cases of 4309 (12.6 percent) of the 34,069 evaluated patients. Conclusions: A simple decision instrument based on clinical criteria can help physicians to identify reliably the patients who need radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma. Application of this instrument could reduce the use of imaging in such patients. (N Engl J Med 2000;343:94-9.) (C) 2000, Massachusetts Medical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 99
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   CLINICAL INDICATIONS FOR CERVICAL-SPINE RADIOGRAPHS IN THE TRAUMATIZED PATIENT [J].
BACHULIS, BL ;
LONG, WB ;
HYNES, GD ;
JOHNSON, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 153 (05) :473-477
[2]   OCCULT CERVICAL-SPINE FRACTURE IN AN AMBULATORY PATIENT [J].
BRESLER, MJ ;
RICH, GH .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1982, 11 (08) :440-442
[3]   HIGH-YIELD ROENTGENOGRAPHIC CRITERIA FOR CERVICAL-SPINE INJURIES [J].
CADOUX, CG ;
WHITE, JD ;
HEDBERG, MC .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (07) :738-742
[4]  
*COMM BIOL EFF ION, 1990, BEIR, V4, P281
[5]  
COX G R, 1991, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V9, P123, DOI 10.1016/0736-4679(91)90316-8
[6]   CERVICAL RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF ALERT PATIENTS FOLLOWING BLUNT TRAUMA [J].
FISCHER, RP .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1984, 13 (10) :905-907
[7]  
FLANCBAUM L, 1987, EMERG MED SERV, V16, P89
[8]  
FLANCBAUM L, 1987, EMERG MED SERV, V16, P36
[9]  
FLANCBAUM L, 1987, EMERG MED SERV, V16, P38
[10]  
GATRELL CB, 1985, AM J EMERG MED, V3, P263, DOI 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90108-1