Efficacy and tolerability of a new estradiol delivering matrix patch (Estraderm MX®) in postmenopausal women

被引:14
作者
de Vrijer, B
Snijders, MPML
Troostwijk, AL
Thé, S
Iding, RJ
Friese, S
Smit, DA
Schierbeek, JM
Brandts, H
van Kempen, PJH
van Buuren, I
Monza, G
机构
[1] Bosch Medicentrum, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-5211 NL Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[2] St Maartensgasthuis, Venio, Netherlands
[3] Ziekenhuis Weezenlanden, Zwolle, Netherlands
[4] Gemini Ziekenhuis, Den Helder, Netherlands
[5] St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Venray, Netherlands
[6] Ignatius Ziekenhuis, Breda, Netherlands
[7] Twenteborg Ziekenhuis, Almelo, Netherlands
[8] St Deventer Ziekenhulzen, Deventer, Netherlands
[9] Med Spectrum Twente, Oldenzaal, Netherlands
[10] Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Wageningen, Netherlands
[11] Ciba, Arnhem, Netherlands
[12] Ciba, Saronno, Italy
关键词
hormone replacement therapy; postmenopausal; hot flushes; transdermal system; Matrix patch;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-5122(99)00085-7
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 [法学]; 0303 [社会学]; 100203 [老年医学];
摘要
Objective: To examine the efficacy and tolerability of a new matrix patch delivering estradiol (E2 Matrix) at doses of 0.05 and 0.10 mg per day (Estraderm MX(R) 50, 100) in the treatment of moderate to severe postmenopausal symptoms. Methods: A total of 254 postmenopausal women were randomized to receive treatment with E2 Matrix 0.10 mg (N = 86), E2 Matrix 0.05 mg (N = 82), or placebo (N = 86) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion for a period of 12 weeks continuously. Patches were applied twice weekly to the buttocks with each patient wearing two patches at all times. The primary efficacy Criterion was the difference from baseline of the mean number of moderate to severe hot flushes per 24 h during the last 2 weeks of treatment. Other efficacy variables included reduction in hot flushes at 4 and 8 weeks, reduction in daytime flushing and night sweats, and Kupperman Index at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: E2 Matrix 0.10 and 0.05 mg were both significantly superior to placebo in reducing hot flushes per 24 h after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001), Also, for all other efficacy parameters studied, both dosage strengths of E2 Matrix were statistically significantly superior to placebo at all time points (P < 0.001). Local tolerability was good in both groups. A slight increase in estrogen related adverse effects (breast tenderness, leukorrhoea) was seen with the 0.10 mg patch. Adhesion of patches and compliance were good. Overall systemic tolerability was good in both treated groups. However, a 4.8% overall incidence of endometrial hyperplasia was observed in patients with an intact uterus. Conclusions: This new matrix patch offers an effective and well tolerated dosage form for delivery of 0.05 and 0.1 mg estradiol per day. It may be particularly suitable for those women who experience local sensitivity to alcohol-containing systems. In light of the observed hyperplasia after treatment in five patients, estrogen therapy should as yet be supplemented monthly with a progestogen in women with an intact uterus. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 55
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
TRANSDERMAL ESTRADIOL - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACODYNAMIC AND PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES, AND THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY IN THE TREATMENT OF MENOPAUSAL COMPLAINTS [J].
BALFOUR, JA ;
HEEL, RC .
DRUGS, 1990, 40 (04) :561-582
[2]
TRANSDERMAL ESTRADIOL - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL PROFILE, AND THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS [J].
BALFOUR, JA ;
MCTAVISH, D .
DRUGS & AGING, 1992, 2 (06) :487-507
[3]
SKIN SENSITIVITY AND TRANSDERMAL DRUG-DELIVERY - A REVIEW OF THE PROBLEM [J].
CARMICHAEL, AJ .
DRUG SAFETY, 1994, 10 (02) :151-159
[4]
A RISK-BENEFIT APPRAISAL OF TRANSDERMAL ESTRADIOL THERAPY [J].
CHEANG, A ;
SITRUKWARE, R ;
UTIAN, WH .
DRUG SAFETY, 1993, 9 (05) :365-379
[5]
CLISHAM JH, 1988, FERTIL STERIL S, pS24
[6]
GELFAND MM, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V74, P398
[7]
CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH A 7-DAY ESTRADIOL TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM FOR ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY [J].
GORDON, SF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (03) :998-1004
[8]
HOWIE H, 1995, MENOPAUSE, V2, P43
[9]
PHARMACOKINETICS OF ESTROGENS AND PROGESTOGENS [J].
KUHL, H .
MATURITAS, 1990, 12 (03) :171-197
[10]
COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ESTROGENIC PREPARATIONS BY THE MENOPAUSAL AND AMENORRHEAL INDICES [J].
KUPPERMAN, HS ;
BLATT, MHG ;
WIESBADER, H ;
FILLER, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1953, 13 (06) :688-703