Relationship between the birth cohort pattern of Helicobacter pylori infection and the epidemiology of duodenal ulcer

被引:33
作者
Harvey, RF [1 ]
Spence, RW
Lane, JA
Nair, P
Murray, LJ
Harvey, IM
Donovan, J
机构
[1] Frenchay Hosp, Dept Med, Bristol BS16 1LE, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/qjmed/95.8.519
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Helicobacter- pylori- related duodenal ulcer (DU) is an important cause of dyspepsia. Aim: To determine the relationship between the pattern of H. pylori infection and the epidemiology of duodenal ulcer in a single population. Design: Prospective two- part study of (i) patients with DU referred for endoscopy because of dyspepsia, and (ii) the incidence of H. pylori infection in the general population of the same area. Methods: Details of 533 DU patients were recorded, and related to the pattern of H. pylori infection among 10 537 adults in the same community, determined by the C-13- urea breath test. Results: In patients with DU, birth year was more important than age in determining the rate of presentation for endoscopy (the `birth cohort' effect). H. pylori infection showed a similar birth cohort effect, and the prevalence decreased steadily in those born in successive years, from 28.8% in the 1930s to 3.5% in the 1970s. The proportion of dyspeptic patients who had duodenal ulcers also fell progressively, from 22.2% in 1979 to 5.7% in 1998. H. pylori prevalence and duodenal ulcer incidence were closely correlated at all ages. Discussion: Duodenal ulcer prevalence (as judged by the rate of referral of duodenal ulcer patients for endoscopy) is determined principally by the distribution of H. pylori infection in the local population. The birth cohort effect seen in adult duodenal ulcer patients reflects the acquisition of H. pylori in childhood. In Bristol, H. pylori prevalence and duodenal ulcer incidence are both declining to very low levels.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 525
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   THE COHORT EFFECT AND HELICOBACTER-PYLORI [J].
BANATVALA, N ;
MAYO, K ;
MEGRAUD, F ;
JENNINGS, R ;
DEEKS, JJ ;
FELDMAN, RA .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 168 (01) :219-221
[2]  
BONNEVIE O, 1975, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V10, P385
[3]   EMPIRICAL H-2-BLOCKER THERAPY OR PROMPT ENDOSCOPY IN MANAGEMENT OF DYSPEPSIA [J].
BYTZER, P ;
HANSEN, JM ;
DEMUCKADELL, OBS .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8901) :811-816
[4]  
COGGON D, 1981, LANCET, V1, P1302
[5]  
COGHLAN JG, 1987, LANCET, V2, P1109
[6]  
DOLL R, 1951, SPECIAL REPORT SERIE, V276
[7]   A citric acid solution is an optimal test drink in the C-13-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection [J].
DominguezMunoz, JE ;
Leodolter, A ;
Sauerbruch, T ;
Malfertheiner, P .
GUT, 1997, 40 (04) :459-462
[8]   THE CLINICAL BENEFIT OF ROUTINE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
FJOSNE, U ;
KLEVELAND, PM ;
WALDUM, H ;
HALVORSEN, T ;
PETERSEN, H .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 21 (04) :433-440
[9]   PEPTIC ULCER - PROFILE [J].
FRY, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1964, 2 (541) :809-+
[10]   A prospective randomised trial of a "test and treat" policy versus endoscopy based management in young Helicobacter pylori positive patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia, referred to a hospital clinic [J].
Heaney, A ;
Collins, JSA ;
Watson, RGP ;
McFarland, RJ ;
Bamford, KB ;
Tham, TCK .
GUT, 1999, 45 (02) :186-190