Responsibility: The new business imperative

被引:306
作者
Waddock, SA [1 ]
Bodwell, C
Graves, SB
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Management, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[2] Int Labor Org, New York, NY 10017 USA
来源
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE | 2002年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AME.2002.7173581
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Businesses today are experiencing profound pressures to reform and improve stakeholder-related practices and their impacts on stakeholders and the natural environment-in short, to manage responsibly as well as profitably. Pressures for expanding the emphasis on profits to managing responsibly derive from three general sources: primary stakeholders such as owners, employees, customers, and suppliers; secondary stakeholders such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), activists, communities, and governments; and general societal trends and institutional forces. The latter include a proliferation of "best of" rankings, the steady emergence and development of global principles and standards that are raising public expectations about corporate responsibility, and new reporting initiatives emphasizing the so-called triple bottom lines of economic, social, and environmental performance. To respond to these pressures, many multinational corporations (MNCs) in particular are developing what we have called total responsibility management (TRM) systems approaches for managing their responsibilities to stakeholders and the natural environment. In this article we outline the dominant pressures pushing the evolution of total responsibility management and present a managerial framework that highlights the three main components of TRM approaches-inspiration (vision), integration, and improvement/innovation-with the indicators inherent to a responsibility measurement approach.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 148
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Journal of Investing, DOI DOI 10.3905/JOI.1997.57
[2]  
Bell T. B., 1997, Auditing organizations through a strategic-systems lens: the KPMG business measurement process
[3]  
Burke E. M., 1999, Corporate Community Relations: The Principle of the Neighbor of Choice
[4]   A STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING AND EVALUATING CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
CLARKSON, MBE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) :92-117
[5]   Learning from the quality movement: What did and didn't happen and why? [J].
Cole, RE .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 41 (01) :43-+
[6]  
CONE C, 2002, UNPUB REP MAN C JUN
[7]  
*CTR CORP COMM REL, 2000, STAND EXC CORP COMME
[8]  
Dahlgaard SMP, 1999, TOTAL QUAL MANAGE, V10, pS473
[9]  
David Diltz J., 1995, APPL FINANCIAL EC, V5, P69, DOI [DOI 10.1080/758529174, 10.1080/758529174]
[10]   BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :532-550