Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes

被引:101
作者
Cho, JW
Amy, G
Pellegrino, J
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Phys & Chem Properties Div, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[2] KJIST, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Puk Gu, Kwangju 500712, South Korea
[3] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
flux decline; fouling; relative molecular mass cut-off; MWCO; natural organic matter; NOM; TFC; polyethersulfone; rejection; ultrafiltration;
D O I
10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00017-5
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Three ultrafiltration membranes [thin-film composite, polyethersulfone (PES), and sulfonated PES] which have different chemistries and nominal relative molecular mass cut-offs (MWCO), were compared in terms of their characteristics of flux; decline, rejection of natural organic matter (NOM), and the adsorbed foulants, with two very different (relatively hydrophilic and hydrophobic) NOM-contaifiing source waters. To facilitate comparison, the ratio (J(o)/k) of the initial pure water flux J(o) to the estimated boundary layer mass transfer coefficient k was used to define similar initial hydrodynamic operating conditions for the three different membranes, The membranes showed differences in NOM rejection when filtering hydrophilic NOM-source water, and also exhibited differences in flux decline with the hydrophobic NOM-source water. Flux decline and NOM-rejection were quantified using a resistances-in-series model-and effective molecular mass cut-off, respectively. Non-charged NOM fractions (hydrophilic and hydrophobic neutrals/bases) were found to be significant foulants for these negatively charged membranes.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:16
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects [J].
Braghetta, A ;
DiGiano, FA ;
Ball, WP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (07) :628-641
[2]   THE USE OF ANIONIC SURFACTANTS FOR REDUCING FOULING OF ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES - THEIR EFFECTS AND OPTIMIZATION [J].
CHEN, V ;
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1992, 67 (2-3) :249-261
[3]   Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Childress, AE ;
Elimelech, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 119 (02) :253-268
[4]  
CHO J, IN PRESS J MEMBR SCI
[5]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (11) :2517-2526
[6]  
CLARK MM, 1998, COMMUNICATION
[7]   The effect of CA membrane properties on adsorptive fouling by humic acid [J].
Combe, C ;
Molis, E ;
Lucas, P ;
Riley, R ;
Clark, MM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1999, 154 (01) :73-87
[8]   NEW COMPOSITE CHARGED REVERSE-OSMOSIS MEMBRANE [J].
IKEDA, K ;
NAKANO, T ;
ITO, H ;
KUBOTA, T ;
YAMAMOTO, S .
DESALINATION, 1988, 68 (2-3) :109-119
[9]   ADSORPTION OF AQUATIC HUMIC SUBSTANCES ON HYDROPHOBIC ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES [J].
JUCKER, C ;
CLARK, MM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 97 :37-52
[10]   Monitoring the properties of natural organic matter through UV spectroscopy: A consistent theory [J].
Korshin, GV ;
Li, CW ;
Benjamin, MM .
WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (07) :1787-1795