Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes

被引:109
作者
Tanninen, J. [1 ]
Manttari, M. [1 ]
Nystrom, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Dept Chem Technol, Lab Membrane Technol & Tech Polymer Chem, FIN-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
nanofiltration; salt separation; charge effect; Donnan effect; streaming potential;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2006.06.012
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Desal-5 DK, NF 270, NF (Dow), NF 20 and ESNA-1-LF nanofiltration membranes were tested for their selectivity, when single and mixed salt solutions (NaCl, NaCl:Na2SO4 1:1 ratio) of different concentrations were filtered at a constant permeate flux. Streaming potential measurements were used to characterise the new NF 20 (Sepro) and NF (Dow) membranes. The membrane surface charge increased the retentions when dilute salt solutions were filtered. The best selectivity was generally achieved using low permeate fluxes and high salt concentrations. At higher salt concentrations the charge effects were diminished. Negative NaCl retention values were obtained for all but the ESNA-1-LF membrane, when concentrated mixed salt solutions were filtered. The use of higher permeate fluxes increased salt retentions in general. The measured isoelectric points (IP) for the NF (Dow) and the NF 20 (Sepro) membranes were 5.1 and 6.6, respectively. Owing to the close proximity of the IP of the NF 20 membrane to the filtration conditions, the effect of the surface charge on the separation was limited and salt fractionation was efficient at all tested salt concentrations. Of the studied membranes, the NF (Dow) and the Desal-5 DK showed the best selectivity. According to the salt retention data, the ESNA-1-LF membrane should not be considered a nanofiltration membrane, but rather a slightly open reverse osmosis membrane. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Comparative study of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dairy effluent treatment by dead-end filtration [J].
Balannec, B ;
Vourch, M ;
Rabiller-Baudry, M ;
Chaufer, B .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 42 (02) :195-200
[2]   Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds.: Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention [J].
Bargeman, G ;
Vollenbroek, JM ;
Straatsma, J ;
Schroën, CGPH ;
Boom, RM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 247 (1-2) :11-20
[3]   Sulphate removal by nanofiltration [J].
Barr, A .
FILTRATION & SEPARATION, 2001, 38 (06) :18-20
[4]   Coupled model of concentration polarization and pore transport in crossflow nanofiltration [J].
Bhattacharjee, S ;
Chen, JC ;
Elimelech, M .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2001, 47 (12) :2733-2745
[5]  
BOWEN WR, 1998, T ICHEME, V76, P885
[6]  
Donnan FG, 1911, Z ELKTROCHEM ANGEW P, V17, P572
[8]   Permeation of mixed-salt solutions with commercial and pore-filled nanofiltration membranes: membrane charge inversion phenomena [J].
Garcia-Aleman, J ;
Dickson, JM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 239 (02) :163-172
[9]   Mathematical modeling of nanofiltration membranes with mixed electrolyte solutions [J].
Garcia-Aleman, J ;
Dickson, JM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 235 (1-2) :1-13
[10]   Experimental analysis of negative salt rejection in nanofiltration membranes [J].
Gilron, J ;
Gara, N ;
Kedem, O .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 185 (02) :223-236