Cost-effectiveness of measles elimination in Latin America and the Caribbean: a prospective analysis

被引:36
作者
Acharya, A
Diaz-Ortega, JL
Tambini, G
Quadros, C
Arita, I
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] PAHO, Div Vaccines & Immunizat, Washington, DC USA
[4] ACIH, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
measles; eradication; cost-effectiveness; immunization; Latin America;
D O I
10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00296-7
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: In 1994, the Americas set a goal of interrupting indigenous measles transmission from the Western Hemisphere by 2000. To accomplish this goal, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) developed an enhanced measles vaccination strategy. Methods: Cost data was collected at PAHO for Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries covering 96% of the region's population on components of the routine programs, and the 'follow-up' activities from member countries. In order to interpret our findings we have compared the present scenario regarding measles with one that would have ensued if past trends continued. Results: For the entire LAC population, estimated cost of elimination program will be US$ 571 million in present value terms. Interpretation: The vaccination strategy toward achieving elimination of measles costs US$ 244 million, incremental from the cost of vaccination before the elimination program. Within 2000-2020, the current program will have prevented the occurrence of 3.2 million cases of measles and 16,000 deaths. Thus, vaccination strategy prevents a single case of measles at the cost of US$ 71.75 and prevents a death due to measles at the cost of US$ 15,000. The case fatality rate depends on a well functioning treatment program for measles cases. The vaccination strategy saves a total of US$ 208 million in treatments costs due to reduced incidence of measles. 0 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3332 / 3341
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   OVERCROWDING AND INTENSIVE EXPOSURE AS DETERMINANTS OF MEASLES MORTALITY [J].
AABY, P ;
BUKH, J ;
LISSE, IM ;
SMITS, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1984, 120 (01) :49-63
[2]  
*CDC, 2000, MORBIDITY MORTALITY, P880
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control, 1998, MORBIDITY MORTALITY
[4]  
Cisse B, 1999, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V149, P295, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009811
[5]   Measles elimination:: progress and challenges [J].
Cutts, FT ;
Henao-Restrepo, AM ;
Olivé, JM .
VACCINE, 1999, 17 :S47-S52
[6]  
de Quadros C A, 1998, Bull World Health Organ, V76 Suppl 2, P47
[7]   Measles elimination in the Americas - Evolving strategies [J].
deQuadros, CA ;
Olive, JM ;
Hersh, BS ;
Strassburg, MA ;
Henderson, DA ;
BrandlingBennett, D ;
Alleyne, GAO .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (03) :224-229
[8]   Eradication of wild poliovirus from the Americas: Acute flaccid paralysis surveillance, 1988-1995 [J].
deQuadros, CA ;
Hersh, BS ;
Olive, JM ;
Andrus, JK ;
daSilveira, CM ;
Carrasco, PA .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 175 :S37-S42
[9]  
DEQUADROS CA, 1998, JAMA S2, V76, P47
[10]   Measles vaccines - A review of adverse events [J].
Duclos, P ;
Ward, BJ .
DRUG SAFETY, 1998, 19 (06) :435-454