The size distribution of trans-Neptunian bodies

被引:335
作者
Bernstein, GM
Trilling, DE
Allen, RL
Brown, ME
Holman, M
Malhotra, R
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Phys & Astron, David Rittenhouse Lab, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys & Astron, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
[3] CALTECH, Div Geol & Planetary Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[4] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Planetary Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Kuiper belt; solar system : formation;
D O I
10.1086/422919
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We search 0.02 deg(2) of the invariable plane for trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) 25 AU or more distant using the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) aboard the Hubble Space Telescope. With 22 ks per pointing, the search is more than 50% complete for m(606W) less than or equal to 29.2. Three new objects are discovered, the faintest with mean magnitude m 28: 3 (diameter approximate to25 km), which is 3 mag fainter than any previously well-measured solar system body. Each new discovery is verified with a follow-up 18 ks observation with the ACS, and the detection efficiency is verified with implanted objects. The three detections are a factor of similar to25 less than would be expected under extrapolation of the power-law differential sky density for brighter objects, Sigma(m) = dN/dm dOmega proportional to 10(alpham) with alpha approximate to 0.63. Analysis of the ACS data and recent TNO surveys from the literature reveals departures from this power law at both the bright and faint ends. Division of the TNO sample by distance and inclination into "classical Kuiper belt" (CKB) and "Excited" samples reveals that Sigma(m) differs for the two populations at 96% confidence, and both samples show departures from power-law behavior. A double power-law Sigma(m) adequately fits all data. Implications of these departures include the following: (1) The total mass of the "classical" Kuiper belt is approximate to0.010 M-circle plus, only a few times Pluto's mass, and is predominantly in the form of similar to100 km bodies (barring a secondary peak in the mass distribution at sub-10 km sizes). The mass of Excited objects is perhaps a few times larger. (2) The Excited class has a shallower bright-end magnitude (and, presumably, size) distribution; the largest objects, including Pluto, make up tens of percent of the total mass whereas the largest CKB objects are only similar to2% of its mass. (3) The derived size distributions predict that the largest Excited body should be roughly the mass of Pluto, and the largest CKB body should have m(R) approximate to 20-hence, Pluto is feasibly considered to have originated from the same physical process as the Excited TNOs. (4) The observed deficit of small TNOs occurs in the size regime where present-day collisions are expected to be disruptive, suggesting extensive depletion by collisions. The Excited and CKB size distributions are qualitatively similar to some numerical models of growth and erosion, with both accretion and erosion appearing to have proceeded to more advanced stages in the Excited class than in the CKB. (5) The lack of detections of distant TNOs implies that if a mass of TNOs comparable to the CKB is present near the invariable plane beyond 50 AU, that distant population must be composed primarily of bodies smaller than approximate to40 km. (6) There are too few small CKB objects for this population to be the reservoir of Jupiter-family comet precursors without a significant upturn in the population at diameters under 20 km. With optimistic model parameters and extrapolations, the Excited population could be the source reservoir. Implications of these discoveries for the formation and evolution of the outer solar system are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1364 / 1390
页数:27
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Constraints on the birth aggregate of the solar system [J].
Adams, FC ;
Laughlin, G .
ICARUS, 2001, 150 (01) :151-162
[2]   TAOS: The Taiwanese-American Occultation Survey [J].
Alcock, C ;
Dave, R ;
Giammarco, J ;
Goldader, J ;
Lehner, M ;
King, SK ;
Lee, T ;
Wang, A ;
Wang, SY ;
Wen, CY ;
Chen, WP ;
Cook, K ;
Marshall, S ;
Porrata, R ;
Byun, YI ;
de Pater, I ;
Rice, J ;
Lissauer, J .
EARTH MOON AND PLANETS, 2003, 92 (1-4) :459-464
[3]   Observational limits on a distant cold Kuiper belt [J].
Allen, RL ;
Bernstein, GM ;
Malhotra, R .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 124 (05) :2949-2954
[4]   The edge of the solar system [J].
Allen, RL ;
Bernstein, GM ;
Malhotra, R .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 549 (02) :L241-L244
[5]  
ANDERSON J, 2003, 2002 HST CAL WORKSH, P13
[6]  
Beckwith S. V. W., 2000, Protostars and planets 4, P533
[7]   Orbit fitting and uncertainties for Kuiper belt objects [J].
Bernstein, G ;
Khushalani, B .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 120 (06) :3323-3332
[8]  
BERNSTEIN GM, 2004, UNPUB
[9]   SExtractor: Software for source extraction [J].
Bertin, E ;
Arnouts, S .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1996, 117 (02) :393-404
[10]   The plane of the Kuiper belt [J].
Brown, ME ;
Pan, M .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 127 (04) :2418-2423