A prospective audit of selective cholangiography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:10
作者
Jorgensen, JO [1 ]
Norman, SL [1 ]
Hunt, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] ST GEORGE HOSP,UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL SURG UNIT,SYDNEY,NSW,AUSTRALIA
来源
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 1996年 / 66卷 / 07期
关键词
choledocholithiasis; common bile duct size; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; outcome analysis; prospective study; selective cholangiography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00779.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: With the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been a reduction in the use of operative cholangiography. The practice of selective cholangiography (SC), where the common bile duct (CBD) is imaged only in those patients where the surgeon believes there is a significant risk of CBD stones has contributed to this reduction. Selective cholangiography has been criticized by advocates of routine cholangiography who argue that there will be more CBD stones missed and more CBD injuries. Methods: This prospective study reports the outcome in a series of 457 patients who had LC performed between 1990 and 1992 where cholangiography was used according to a strict protocol relying on clinical history, CBD size and pre-operative liver function tests. There were no CBD injuries. Twenty-nine patients (6.4%) had CBD stones. Results: Follow up by structured questionnaire at 12-24 months detected 6 patients (1.3%) with CBD stones. Three of these 6 patients had cholangiograms. Of the 3 patients with missed stones and no X-ray, 2 were protocol breaches and only] patient from 307 (0.3%) with no indication for SC was subsequently found to have a CBD stone. Conclusion: We believe that this study validates a policy of SC.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 444
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   ROUTINE OR INDICATED OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY [J].
CADE, R ;
COLLOPY, B ;
RYAN, P .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 50 (05) :481-483
[2]   TRANS-CYSTIC DUCT OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY - PERSONAL-EXPERIENCE WITH 500 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
FARHA, GJ ;
PEARSON, RN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1976, 131 (02) :228-231
[3]   THE CASE AGAINST ROUTINE OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY [J].
GERBER, A ;
APT, MK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 143 (06) :734-736
[4]   PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS INDICATORS - A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION [J].
HAUERJENSEN, M ;
KARESEN, R ;
NYGAARD, K ;
SOLHEIM, K ;
AMLIE, E ;
HAVIG, O ;
VIDDAL, KO .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 202 (01) :64-68
[5]   PREOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENT OF BILE-DUCT DIAMETER - BASIS FOR SELECTIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY [J].
HUNT, DR ;
REITER, L ;
SCOTT, AJ .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 60 (03) :189-192
[6]   APPRAISAL OF THE MANAGEMENT OF BILE-DUCT STONES [J].
JOHNSON, AG ;
HOSKING, SW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (07) :555-560
[7]   PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF THE RISK OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES [J].
LACAINE, F ;
CORLETTE, MB ;
BISMUTH, H .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1980, 115 (09) :1114-1116
[8]  
Mirizzi PL, 1937, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V65, P702
[9]  
MORGENSTERN L, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P400
[10]  
PAGANA TJ, 1980, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V115, P1214