Comparison of four laboratory tests for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

被引:23
作者
Jacobs, J
Rudensky, B
Dresner, J
Berman, A
Sonnenblick, M
vanDijk, Y
Yinnon, AM
机构
[1] SHAARE ZEDEK MED CTR,CLIN MICROBIOL LAB,IL-91031 JERUSALEM,ISRAEL
[2] SHAARE ZEDEK MED CTR,DEPT MED,IL-91031 JERUSALEM,ISRAEL
[3] SHAARE ZEDEK MED CTR,INFECT DIS UNIT,IL-91031 JERUSALEM,ISRAEL
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01709364
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Four different laboratory tests for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea were compared to determine the optimal one for management of patients with hospital-acquired diarrhea, Stool samples from 231 patients with diarrhea were tested by the following methods: culture for Clostridium difficile with subsequent determination of exotoxin production, with a toxigenic Clostridium difficile positive (TCP) result considered truly positive; enzyme immunoassay (EIA); latex agglutination test; and an immunobinding blot assay, The rates of positive results were as follows: EIA 5.5%, TCP 7.3%, latex agglutination 16.7%, and immunobinding blot assay 26.1%. Compared to the TCP results, the sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 61 and 98% for EIA, 47 and 85% for latex agglutination, and 60 and 76% for the immunobinding blot assay. Samples from patients with greater than or equal to 6 stools/day were TCP and EIA positive in 27 and 17% of cases, respectively, whereas in patients with < 6 stools/day, these percentages decreased to 2 and 3%, respectively (p < 0.001). In hospitalized patients with greater than or equal to 6 stools/day, EIA appears to be the optimal test for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, with a 73% positive predictive value and a 97% negative predictive value, However, in patients with < 6 stools/day, the prevalence of Clostridium difficile is low, and laboratory detection of this organism remains problematic.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 566
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   STAPHYLOCOCCAL ENTEROCOLITIS FOLLOWING ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY [J].
ALTEMEIER, WA ;
HILL, EO ;
HUMMEL, RP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1963, 157 (06) :847-&
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1893, Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp
[3]   COMPARISON OF 3 ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS, A CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY, AND TOXIGENIC CULTURE FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA [J].
BARBUT, F ;
KAJZER, C ;
PLANAS, N ;
PETIT, JC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (04) :963-967
[4]   ANTIBIOTIC-ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA [J].
BARTLETT, JG .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1992, 15 (04) :573-581
[5]   ANTIBIOTIC-ASSOCIATED PSEUDOMEMBRANOUS COLITIS DUE TO TOXIN-PRODUCING CLOSTRIDIA [J].
BARTLETT, JG ;
CHANG, TW ;
GURWITH, M ;
GORBACH, SL ;
ONDERDONK, AB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 298 (10) :531-534
[6]   USEFULNESS OF CULTURE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION [J].
BOND, F ;
PAYNE, G ;
BORRIELLO, SP ;
HUMPHREYS, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 14 (03) :223-226
[7]   LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE-ASSOCIATED GASTROINTESTINAL-DISEASE - COMPARISON OF A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR TOXIN-A AND TOXIN-B WITH A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR TOXIN-A ONLY AND 2 CYTOTOXICITY ASSAYS [J].
DOERN, GV ;
COUGHLIN, RT ;
WU, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (08) :2042-2046
[8]   CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE AND ITS CYTO-TOXIN IN FECES OF PATIENTS WITH ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA AND MISCELLANEOUS CONDITIONS [J].
GEORGE, WL ;
ROLFE, RD ;
FINEGOLD, SM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1982, 15 (06) :1049-1053
[9]  
GERDING DN, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P459
[10]  
GUMMERLOCK PH, 1991, REV INFECTIOUS DIS, V13, P1053