EIA practice in India and its evaluation using SWOT analysis

被引:130
作者
Paliwal, Ritu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Energy Res Inst, Ctr Regulatory & Policy Res, Sch Adv Studies, Habitat Ctr, New Delhi 110003, India
关键词
environmental impact assessment; India; SWOT analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2006.01.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In India Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been formally introduced in 1994. It relied on the institutional framework that has a strong supporting legislative, administrative and procedural set-up. Both central and state authorities together are sharing the responsibility of its development and management. A Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat (SWOT) analysis taken up in this article has suggested that there are several issues that need to be readdressed. It highlights several constraints, ranging from improper screening and scoping guidelines to ineffective monitoring and post project evaluation. The opportunities are realised as increasing public awareness, initiatives of environmental groups and business community and forward thinking to integrate environmental consideration into plans and policies. Poor governance, rapid economic reforms, and favours to small-scale units are some of the foreseen threats to the system. This article concludes with some suggestions to improve EIA process in India. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 510
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Biswas D., 1996, TECH MONITOR, V13, P16
[2]  
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), 1996, INV HAZ WAST GEN 5 D
[3]   Incorporating cleaner production analysis into environmental impact assessment in China [J].
Chen, WM ;
Warren, KA ;
Duan, N .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 1999, 19 (5-6) :457-476
[4]  
CHOPRA K, 1993, ENV IMPACT PROJECTS
[5]  
CLAYTON BD, 1998, STRATEGIC ENV ASSESS, P31
[6]  
*CPCB, 2002, PUBL INT LIT PAR NEW
[7]  
*CPCB, 2002, POLL CONTR SMALL SCA
[8]  
*CPCB, 1994, INVENTORY LARGE MEDI, V2
[9]  
*CSE, 1996, DOWN EARTH, V5
[10]  
Fearnside PM., 1994, IMPACT ASSESSMENT, V12, P21, DOI DOI 10.1080/07349165.1994.9725849