Prostate-specific antigen:: A review of the validation of the most commonly used cancer biomarker

被引:216
作者
Hernández, J [1 ]
Thompson, IM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
prostate carcinoma; prostate-specific antigen (PSA); screening; biomarkers;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.20480
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The widespread use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has had a tremendous impact on all aspects of the management of prostate carcinoma. Although PSA-based screening has resulted in a stage migration to more organ-confined tumors at the time of diagnosis, and has been temporally associated with a decrease in prostate carcinoma mortality, PSA screening is imperfect. A recent analysis of results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) has provided insight into the positive predictive value of PSA in the so-called "normal" range. METHODS. The history of the discovery, initial studies, and subsequent widespread application of PSA screening is reviewed. RESULTS. The application of PSA for screening preceded the development of current prostate biopsy techniques and an upper limit of normal was established without complete disease ascertainment. More recent modifications of PSA-based screening have been adopted clinically without sufficient validation. With current methods, overdiagnosis of clinically unimportant disease almost certainly occurs and high-grade, aggressive disease may not be detected sufficiently early to allow successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS. To the authors' knowledge, the optimal upper limit of normal for PSA for prostate carcinoma screening is unknown. New biomarkers of disease are needed; these must be linked with disease prognosis and must be validated in rigorously designed clinical trials. (C) 2004 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 904
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]   Racial differences in prostate-specific antigen levels and prostate-specific antigen densities in patients with prostate cancer [J].
Abdalla, I ;
Ray, P ;
Ray, V ;
Vaida, F ;
Vijayakumar, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 22 (06) :537-541
[2]  
ABLIN RJ, 1970, J REPROD FERTIL, V22, P573
[3]  
ABLIN RJ, 1970, J IMMUNOL, V104, P1329
[4]   Deferred treatment of locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer: A long-term followup [J].
Adolfsson, J ;
Steineck, G ;
Hedlund, PO .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (02) :505-508
[5]   Pathologic variables and recurrence rates as related to obesity and race in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy [J].
Amling, CL ;
Riffenburgh, RH ;
Sun, L ;
Moul, JW ;
Lance, RS ;
Kusuda, L ;
Sexton, WJ ;
Soderdahl, DW ;
Donahue, TF ;
Foley, JP ;
Chung, AK ;
McLeod, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (03) :439-445
[6]   Relationship between obesity and race in predicting adverse pathologic variables in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy [J].
Amling, CL ;
Kane, CJ ;
Riffenburgh, RH ;
Ward, JF ;
Roberts, JL ;
Lance, RS ;
Friedrichs, PA ;
Moul, JW .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (05) :723-728
[7]   Familial prostate cancer cases before and after radical prostatectomy do not show any aggressiveness compared with sporadic cases [J].
Azzouzi, AR ;
Valeri, A ;
Cormier, L ;
Fournier, G ;
Mangin, P ;
Cussenot, O .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (06) :1193-1197
[8]   Androgen receptor length polymorphism associated with prostate cancer risk in Hispanic men [J].
Balic, I ;
Graham, ST ;
Troyer, DA ;
Higgins, BA ;
Pollock, BH ;
Johnson-Pais, TL ;
Thompson, IM ;
Leach, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05) :2245-2248
[9]  
BARAK M, 1989, J LAB CLIN MED, V113, P598
[10]   Significance of familial history of prostate cancer to traditional prognostic variables, genetic biomarkers, and recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Bauer, JJ ;
Srivastava, S ;
Connelly, RR ;
Sesterhenn, IA ;
Preston, DM ;
McLeod, DG ;
Moul, JW .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (06) :970-976