Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: A review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative

被引:278
作者
Gurney, H
机构
[1] Department of Medical Oncology and Palliative Care, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1996.14.9.2590
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To review the current dose-calculation practice and propose a non-body-surface area (BSA)-based dose-calculation method. Methods: Data that supported the introduction of BSA-based dose calculation in the late 1950s were reviewed, Data on 18 drugs that correlated pharmacokinetic (PK) variables for cytotoxic drugs with BSA were examined, Other methods of dose calculation, such as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and adaptive control, were also examined. Results: The BSA-based method of dose calculation was adopted without adequate investigation of its accuracy. BSA fails to standardize the marked interpatient variation in PK for most cytotoxic drugs, A definite correlation was found between PK variables and BSA for only one drug (docetaxel). PK parameters correlate with toxicity, as well as response in some tumors, but do nor completely explain the variation in drug effect between individuals. The complexities of TDM may make its universal use impractical, A non-BSA-based dose calculation method is proposed that defines three mandatory steps: prime dose, modified dose, and toxicity-adjusted dose (PMT dosing), Prime dose is the fixed dose of a drug used alone or in combination and is derived from the reanalysis of phase I/II studies and from clinical practice, Modified dose is an adjustment of the prime dose before administration, based on dose-adjustment guidelines that predict the drug-handling ability of on individual. Population pharmacodynamic studies may be used for the development of these guidelines, Subsequent doses are adjusted in each patient according to a target toxicity, such as nadir neutrophil count or other objective toxicity, that serves as a surrogate marker for potential antitumor effect (toxicity-adjusted dose), Patients who ore predicted to have very abnormal drug handling should be excluded from such a dosing scheme and TDM may be more suitable, Conclusion: The routine use of SSA for dose calculation should be reevaluated, Other methods of dose calculation should be investigated, TDM may be impractical in all patients and remains unvalidated. PMT dosing ensures that the condition of each individual is considered, to predict drug effects better, Clinical dose-calculation systems such as PMT dosing should be evaluated prospectively.
引用
收藏
页码:2590 / 2611
页数:22
相关论文
共 192 条
[1]   DRUG DISPOSITION IN OBESE HUMANS - AN UPDATE [J].
ABERNETHY, DR ;
GREENBLATT, DJ .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1986, 11 (03) :199-213
[2]   HIGH-DOSE METHOTREXATE - A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL [J].
ACKLAND, SP ;
SCHILSKY, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (12) :2017-2031
[3]  
ALBERTS DS, 1979, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V26, P737
[4]  
Allerheiligen S, 1994, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V13, P136
[5]   ETOPOSIDE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL AND ABNORMAL ORGAN FUNCTION [J].
ARBUCK, SG ;
DOUGLASS, HO ;
CROM, WR ;
GOODWIN, P ;
SILK, Y ;
COOPER, C ;
EVANS, WE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (11) :1690-1695
[6]  
ARRINGTON KA, 1994, AM J VET RES, V55, P1587
[7]  
AU JLS, 1982, CANCER RES, V42, P2930
[8]  
BAKER RJ, 1957, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V104, P183
[9]   SHOULD ANTICANCER DRUG DOSES BE ADJUSTED IN THE OBESE PATIENT [J].
BAKER, SD ;
GROCHOW, LB ;
DONEHOWER, RC .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (05) :333-334
[10]  
BENNETT CL, 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P1952