Vaccinating healthcare workers against influenza to protect the vulnerable - Is it a good use of healthcare resources? A systematic review of the evidence and an economic evaluation

被引:186
作者
Burls, A [1 ]
Jordan, R
Barton, P
Olowokure, B
Wake, B
Albon, E
Hawker, J
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, W Midlands Hlth Technol Assessment Collaborat, Dept Publ Hlth & Epidemiol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Protect Res & Dev Unit, Dept Publ Hlth & Epidemiol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Hlth Econ Facil, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[4] Birmingham Heartlands Hosp, Hlth Protect Agcy, Reg Surveillance Unit, Birmingham B9 5SS, W Midlands, England
[5] Hlth Protect Agcy, Local & Reg Serv Div, Birmingham B2 4DY, W Midlands, England
关键词
healthcare workers; influenza vaccination; systematic review; economic evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.12.043
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Influenza causes substantial mortality in high-risk groups despite targeted vaccination programmes. This paper considers whether it is worth vaccinating healthcare workers (HCWs) against influenza to protect high-risk patients in a series of systematic reviews and an economic evaluation. Eighteen studies are included. Vaccination was highly effective in HCWs, with minimal adverse effects. Two trials assessed patient mortality after vaccinating HCWs, both of which showed a reduction. Despite recommendations, less than 25% of HCW in Europe and the UK are vaccinated. Five studies looked at programmes to increase uptake; these produced increases of 5%-45%. Published economic evaluations did not include patient benefit; therefore, an economic evaluation using UK data was undertaken. In the base case, vaccination was cost saving (12 pound/vaccinee). In the most pessimistic scenario it cost 405 pound/life-year gained. Effective implementation should be a priority. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4212 / 4221
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Economic costs of influenza-related work absenteeism [J].
Akazawa, M ;
Sindelar, JL ;
Paltiel, AD .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (02) :107-115
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID METH TECHN APPR
[3]   Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bridges, CB ;
Thompson, WW ;
Meltzer, MI ;
Reeve, GR ;
Talamonti, WJ ;
Cox, NJ ;
Lilac, HA ;
Hall, H ;
Klimov, A ;
Fukuda, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (13) :1655-1663
[4]  
*BRIT MED ASS ROYA, 2004, BRIT NAT FORM
[5]  
BURCKEL E, 1999, PHARMACOECONOMICS 2, V16, pT76
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in a healthy, working-age population [J].
Campbell, DS ;
Rumley, MH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1997, 39 (05) :408-414
[7]   Effects of influenza vaccination of health-care workers on mortality of elderly people in long-term care: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Carman, WF ;
Elder, AG ;
Wallace, LA ;
McAulay, K ;
Walker, A ;
Murray, GD ;
Stott, DJ .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9198) :93-97
[8]   INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS-B VACCINE ACCEPTANCE - A SURVEY OF HEALTH-CARE WORKERS [J].
CHRISTIAN, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1991, 19 (04) :177-184
[9]   A novel staff vaccination strategy [J].
Cooper, E ;
O'Reilly, M .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (05) :232-233
[10]  
Curtis, 2003, UNIT COSTS HLTH SOCI