Flow Updating in Real-Time Flood Forecasting Based on Runoff Correction by a Dynamic System Response Curve

被引:48
作者
Bao Weimin [1 ,2 ]
Si Wei [1 ,2 ]
Qu Simin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Resources & Hydrol, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Least-squares estimation; Flood forecasting; Data updating; Xinanjiang model; Dynamic system response curve; Wangjiaba basin; Error correction; DATA ASSIMILATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MODEL; PARAMETERS; CALIBRATION; FILTER; SOIL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000848
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In order to improve the accuracy of real-time flood forecasting, a new accurate and efficient real-time flood forecasting error correction method based on a dynamic system response curve (DSRC) is developed. The dynamic system response curve was introduced into the flood forecasting error correction to establish the dynamic error feedback updating model tracing the source of the error. In this study, the flow concentration of the Xinanjiang (XAJ) model is generalized into a system. The physical basis of the system response curve is the flow concentration of the hydrological model. The theoretical basis of the concept is the differential of the system response function of the runoff time series. Based on the observed and calculated discharge, the calculated runoff series was corrected using least-squares estimation, and then the flow was recalculated with the corrected runoff. The Xinanjiang model was selected to calculate runoff. The method was tested in both an ideal scenario and in a real case study. The proposed method was applied to 26 floods in the Wangjiaba basin. The ratio of qualified flood increased from 65.4 to 92.3% after correction by the DSRC. Comparison with the second-order autoregressive error forecast model [AR(2)] shows that the method can improve the forecasting results effectively. The method has a simple structure, the performance indices will not deteriorate as the forecasting period (i.e.,lead time) increases, and the method does not increase the number of model parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 756
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, 38 WMO
[2]   Neural networks as routine for error updating of numerical models [J].
Babovic, V ;
Canizares, R ;
Jensen, HR ;
Klinting, A .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2001, 127 (03) :181-193
[3]  
Bao W. M., 2006, HYDROLOGICAL FORECAS, P222
[4]  
Bao W. M., 2012, J ADV WATER SCI, V23, P315
[5]  
[瞿思敏 Qu Simin], 2003, [水科学进展, Advances in Water Science], V14, P167
[6]   Estimating Selected Parameters for the XAJ Model under Multicollinearity among Watershed Characteristics [J].
Bao Weimin ;
Li Qian .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2012, 17 (01) :118-128
[7]   Investigation into the impacts of land-use change on sediment yield characteristics in the upper Huaihe River basin, China [J].
Cai, Tao ;
Li, Qiongfang ;
Yu, Meixiu ;
Lu, Guobin ;
Cheng, Lipeng ;
Wei, Xie .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2012, 53-54 :1-9
[8]   Robust recursive estimation of auto-regressive updating model parameters for real-time flood forecasting [J].
Chao, Zhao ;
Hua-sheng, Hong ;
Wei-min, Bao ;
Luo-ping, Zhang .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 349 (3-4) :376-382
[9]   Examining the effectiveness and robustness of sequential data assimilation methods for quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting [J].
DeChant, Caleb M. ;
Moradkhani, Hamid .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
[10]   FLOOD FORECASTING BY THE FILTER SEPARATION AR METHOD AND COMPARISON WITH MODELING EFFICIENCIES BY SOME RAINFALL RUNOFF MODELS [J].
HASEBE, M ;
HINO, M ;
HOSHI, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1989, 110 (1-2) :107-136