Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics, Environment, Ethics, and the Future

被引:52
作者
Bennett, Alan B. [1 ,2 ]
Chi-Ham, Cecilia [2 ]
Barrows, Geoffrey [3 ]
Sexton, Steven [4 ]
Zilberman, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38 | 2013年 / 38卷
关键词
genetic modification; genetic engineering; GMO; GM crops; food security; GENETICALLY-ENGINEERED PLANTS; TRANSGENIC BT COTTON; REGULATING COEXISTENCE; SCIENTISTS ANALYSIS; CROP PRODUCTIVITY; CHOICE EVIDENCE; PESTICIDE USE; GM; IMPACT; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-environ-050912-124612
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural biotechnology and, specifically, the development of genetically modified (GM) crops have been controversial for several reasons, including concerns that the technology poses potential negative environmental or health effects, that the technology would lead to the (further) corporatization of agriculture, and that it is simply unethical to manipulate life in the laboratory. GM crops have been part of the agricultural landscape for more than 15 years and have now been adopted on more than 170 million hectares (ha) in both developed countries (48%) and developing countries (52%). On the basis of this substantial history and data spanning many years, the economic and environmental impacts of GM crops can now be summarized with some certainty, and the analysis indicates that, on balance, many benefits have accrued from the adoption of GM crops. There continue to be many ethical issues that are being debated, and many are being resolved through institutional interventions. The future of agricultural productivity would be better served if the genetic modification debate were less polarized and were focused on the potential for complementarity of GM technologies within a diversified farming system framework.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 279
页数:31
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]   Stakeholder attitudes toward GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico, and South Africa: The issue of public trust [J].
Aerni, P ;
Bernauer, T .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (03) :557-575
[2]   How would Swiss consumers decide if they had freedom of choice? Evidence from a field study with organic, conventional and GM corn bread [J].
Aerni, Philipp ;
Scholderer, Joachim ;
Ermen, David .
FOOD POLICY, 2011, 36 (06) :830-838
[3]   Do Political Attitudes Affect Consumer Choice? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Study with Genetically Modified Bread in Switzerland [J].
Aerni, Philipp .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (09) :1555-1572
[4]  
Am. Med. Assoc, 2012, REP COUNC SCI PUBL H
[5]   Some implications of GM food technology policies for Sub-Saharan africa [J].
Anderson, K ;
Jackson, LA .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2005, 14 (03) :385-410
[6]   Recent and prospective adoption of genetically modified cotton: A global computable general equilibrium analysis of economic impacts [J].
Anderson, Kym ;
Valenzuela, Ernesto ;
Jackson, Lee Ann .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2008, 56 (02) :265-296
[7]   The world trade organisation's Doha cotton initiative: A tale of two issues [J].
Anderson, Kym ;
Valenzuela, Ernesto .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2007, 30 (08) :1281-1304
[8]   Genetically Modified Rice Adoption: Implications for Welfare and Poverty Alleviation [J].
Anderson, Kym ;
Jackson, Lee Ann ;
Nielsen, Chantal Pohl .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, 2005, 20 (04) :771-788
[9]  
Anderson Kym., 2003, Pacific Economic Review, V8, P157, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0106.2002.00217.X
[10]   Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants [J].
Andow, DA ;
Zwahlen, C .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (02) :196-214