Operative and non-operative treatment options for dislocation of the hip following total hip arthroplasty

被引:12
作者
Khan, R. J. K. [1 ]
Carey Smith, R. L. [1 ]
Alakeson, R. [1 ]
Fick, D. P. [1 ]
Wood, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6011, Australia
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2006年 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD005320.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
B a c k g r o u n d Dislocation following hip replacement is associated with significant morbidity and functional cost. The cause is usually multifactorial. A variety of treatment options are available which can broadly be classified into operative and non-operative. O b j e c t i v e s To determine the best methods of treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. S e a r c h s t r a t e g y The following databases were searched until August 2006: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL), Health Technology Assessment database ( HTA), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness ( DARE), International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ( ISRCTN), and MetaRegister of Controlled Trials ( mRCT). S e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing operative and non-operative treatments for recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. D a t a c o l l e c t i o n a n d a n a l y s i s Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion criteria to identified studies. M a i n r e s u l t s Searches identified 269 studies. None fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A u t h o r s ' c o n c l u s i o n s The authors invite researchers to perform RCTs comparing different treatment options for recurrent dislocation of the hip. The heterogeneity of the population and variety of underlying causes would favour a multi-centre study to achieve an adequate sample size.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Dislocationm after revision total hip arthroplasty - An analysis of risk factors and treatment options [J].
Alberton, GM ;
High, WA ;
Morrey, BF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (10) :1788-1792
[2]  
Anderson M J, 1994, J Arthroplasty, V9, P17, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90133-3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Evidence Based Rheumatology
[4]  
[Anonymous], VISUAL RX 2 0 NNT CA
[5]  
Atlihan D, 2002, Hip Int, V12, P308, DOI 10.5301/HIP.2008.1391
[6]   Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement [J].
Beaule, PE ;
Schmalzried, TP ;
Udomkiat, P ;
Amstutz, HC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (02) :256-263
[7]  
Berry D J, 2001, Instr Course Lect, V50, P265
[8]   The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty [J].
Berry, DJ ;
Von Knoch, M ;
Schleck, CD ;
Harmsen, WS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (01) :9-14
[9]   Use of constrained acetabular components for hip instability: An average 10-year follow-up study [J].
Bremner, BRB ;
Goetz, DD ;
Callaghan, JJ ;
Capello, WN ;
Johnston, RC .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (07) :131-137
[10]   Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation -: A study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register [J].
Byström, S ;
Espehaug, B ;
Furnes, O ;
Havelin, LI .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 74 (05) :514-524