Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients

被引：74

作者：

Beck, Ilse ^{[1
]}

Smits, Dirk J. M. ^{[1
,2
]}

Claes, Laurence ^{[1
]}

Vandereycken, Walter ^{[1
]}

Bijttebier, Patricia ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Psychol, Catholic Univ Leuven, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium

[2] HUBrussel, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

来源：

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES | 2009年 / 47卷 / 05期

关键词：

Behavioral inhibition; Behavioral activation; BIS/BAS Scales; SPSRQ; Eating disorders; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; IMPULSIVITY; INHIBITION; PERSONALITY; ANXIETY; BIS/BAS; CARVER; BIS; RST;

D O I：

10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.007

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Gray (1987) proposed two systems underlying much of our behavior and personality. One system (Behavioral Inhibition System, BIS) relates to avoidance or withdrawal behavior, whereas the other system (Behavioral Approach System, BAS) relates to approach behavior. Underreactivity and overreactivity of those systems have been presumed to explain a broad range of psychopathologies. Despite the increasing interest and use of questionnaires measuring BIS and BAS reactivity in psychopathological research, studies examining psychometric qualities of these measures in clinical samples are scarce. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the BIS/BAS Scales and the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) in eating disordered patients. Structural Validity is investigated by means of Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Convergent validity is examined by investigating associations with conceptually related personality traits. For the BIS/BAS Scales, CFA favors a five-factor structure in line with a recent revision of Gray's theory (Gray & McNaughton, 2000). For the SPSRQ, sufficient support was found for a two-factor structure. Reliability and validity of both instruments are in line with previous reports. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：407 / 412

页数：6

共 38 条

[1]

Akaike H., 1977, APPL STAT S P DAYT O, P27

[2]

BANDALOS DL, 2002, STRUCTURAL EQUATION, V1, P35

[3] On tests and indices for evaluating structural models [J].

Bentler, Peter M. .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :825-829

[4]

BIJTTEBIER P, CLIN PSYCHO IN PRESS

[5] Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders [J].

Campbell-Sills, L ;

Liverant, GI ;

Brown, TA .

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2004, 16 (03) :244-254

[6] Relations of serotonin function to personality: Current views and a key methodological issue [J].

Carver, Charles S. ;

Miller, Christopher J. .

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2006, 144 (01) :1-15

[7] BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].

CARVER, CS ;

WHITE, TL .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333

[8] The measurement of individual differences in Behavioural Inhibition and Behavioural Activation Systems: a comparison of personality scales [J].

Caseras, X ;

Avila, C ;

Torrubia, R .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 34 (06) :999-1013

[9] Impulsive and compulsive traits in eating disordered patients compared with controls [J].

Claes, L ;

Vandereyeken, W ;

Vertommen, H .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2002, 32 (04) :707-714

[10]

Claes Laurence, 2006, Eat Behav, V7, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.05.001

← 1 2 3 4 →