Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites

被引:613
作者
Doell, Petra [1 ]
Mueller Schmied, Hannes [1 ]
Schuh, Carina [1 ]
Portmann, Felix T. [1 ]
Eicker, Annette [2 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Phys Geog, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Geodesy & Geoinformat, Bonn, Germany
关键词
LAKE NASSER; SEA-LEVEL; SANDSTONE AQUIFER; SURFACE-WATER; GRAVITY-FIELD; IRRIGATION; VARIABILITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1002/2014WR015595
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
Groundwater depletion (GWD) compromises crop production in major global agricultural areas and has negative ecological consequences. To derive GWD at the grid cell, country, and global levels, we applied a new version of the global hydrological model WaterGAP that simulates not only net groundwater abstractions and groundwater recharge from soils but also groundwater recharge from surface water bodies in dry regions. A large number of independent estimates of GWD as well as total water storage (TWS) trends determined from GRACE satellite data by three analysis centers were compared to model results. GWD and TWS trends are simulated best assuming that farmers in GWD areas irrigate at 70% of optimal water requirement. India, United States, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and China had the highest GWD rates in the first decade of the 21st century. On the Arabian Peninsula, in Libya, Egypt, Mali, Mozambique, and Mongolia, at least 30% of the abstracted groundwater was taken from nonrenewable groundwater during this time period. The rate of global GWD has likely more than doubled since the period 1960-2000. Estimated GWD of 113 km(3)/yr during 2000-2009, corresponding to a sea level rise of 0.31 mm/yr, is much smaller than most previous estimates. About 15% of the globally abstracted groundwater was taken from nonrenewable groundwater during this period. To monitor recent temporal dynamics of GWD and related water abstractions, GRACE data are best evaluated with a hydrological model that, like WaterGAP, simulates the impact of abstractions on water storage, but the low spatial resolution of GRACE remains a challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:5698 / 5720
页数:23
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]
Abderrahman W.A., 2006, Non-Renewable Groundwater Resources: A Guidebook on Socially-Sustainable Management for Water-Policy Makers, P63
[2]
Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability [J].
Alcamo, J ;
Döll, P ;
Henrichs, T ;
Kaspar, F ;
Lehner, B ;
Rösch, T ;
Siebert, S .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2003, 48 (03) :317-337
[3]
[Anonymous], 20065324 US GEOL SUR
[4]
[Anonymous], 2009, STAT REV WORLD EN
[5]
[Anonymous], 2009, 20095019 US GEOL SUR
[6]
Bakhbakhi M., 2002, P INT WORKSHOP TRIPO, P177
[7]
Bettadpur S., 2012, EGU GEN ASS C ABSTRA, V14, P6409
[8]
The water budget myth revisited: Why hydrogeologists model [J].
Bredehoeft, JD .
GROUND WATER, 2002, 40 (04) :340-345
[9]
Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), 2009, GROUNDW RES EST METH, V18
[10]
Spatial Quantification of Groundwater Abstraction in the Irrigated Indus Basin [J].
Cheema, M. J. M. ;
Immerzeel, W. W. ;
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. .
GROUNDWATER, 2014, 52 (01) :25-36