Supply function Nash equilibrium of joint day-ahead electricity markets and forward contracts

被引:27
作者
Banaei, Mohsen [1 ]
Buygi, Majid Oloomi [1 ]
Sheybani, Hani Raouf [2 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Elect Engn Dept, POB 91775-1111, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] Quchan Univ Technol, Elect Engn Dept, POB 94771-67335, Quchan, Iran
关键词
Nash equilibrium; Electricity markets; Forward contracts; BIDDING STRATEGIES; PRODUCERS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.036
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
080906 [电磁信息功能材料与结构]; 082806 [农业信息与电气工程];
摘要
Forward contracts are one of the prevalent and useful tools for managing the risks associated with the volatility of the electricity market prices. Forward contracts and day-ahead electricity market are executed simultaneously, and hence, they affect each other. This paper proposes a comprehensive supply function equilibrium model to consider the mutual interactions between forward contracts and the associated day-ahead electricity market in a power system. Negotiation between each producer and consumer in forward market is taken into account in the model. In order to consider the risk management behaviors of all market players in the model, a new risk management method is presented. The proposed risk management method takes into account the concerns of market players about the future prices of day-ahead market over the delivery period. The model proposed in this paper is applied to a test system with forward and day-ahead markets. The results are compared with the case that there is no forward contract in the power system. Impacts of growing the concerns of producers and consumers about the future, impacts of increasing demand uncertainty, impacts of improving bargaining power of consumers in contracting period and impact of contracting obligations for producers on the simulation results are discussed. The proposed risk management method is compared with CVaR method and its efficiency is evaluated. Finally, applicability of the proposed model to real size power systems is examined.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 116
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Bahrami S, 2015, INT CONF SMART GRID, P205, DOI 10.1109/SmartGridComm.2015.7436301
[2]
Bajpai e P., 2004, Em: International Conference on Power Systems, P571
[3]
Impacts of Strategic Bidding of Wind Power Producers on Electricity Markets [J].
Banaei, Mohsen ;
Buygi, Majid Oloomi ;
Zareipour, Hamidreza .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (06) :4544-4553
[4]
Formulation of oligopolistic competition in ac power networks: An NLP approach [J].
Bautista, Guillermo ;
Anjos, Miguel F. ;
Vannelli, Anthony .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (01) :105-115
[5]
PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[6]
Boyd S., 2004, Convex Optimization.
[7]
Impacts of Large-Scale Integration of Intermittent Resources on Electricity Markets: A Supply Function Equilibrium Approach [J].
Buygi, Majid Oloomi ;
Zareipour, Hamidreza ;
Rosehart, William D. .
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2012, 6 (02) :220-232
[8]
A stochastic programming approach to electric energy procurement for large consumers [J].
Carrion, Miguel ;
Philpott, Andy B. ;
Conejo, Antonio J. ;
Arroyo, Jose M. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (02) :744-754
[9]
Negotiating bilateral contracts in electricity markets [J].
El Khatib, Sameh ;
Galiana, Francisco D. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (02) :553-562
[10]
Weekly Self-Scheduling, Forward Contracting, and Offering Strategy for a Producer [J].
Garces, Lina P. ;
Conejo, Antonio J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (02) :657-666