Randomized clinical trial of hepatectomy using intermittent pedicle occlusion with ischaemic intervals of 15 versus 30 minutes

被引:30
作者
Esaki, M.
Sano, T.
Shimada, K.
Sakamoto, Y.
Takahashi, Y.
Wakai, K.
Kosuge, T.
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg Div, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[2] Aichi Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Div Epidemiol & Prevent, Nagoya, Aichi 464, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.5399
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The optimal ischaemic interval during hepatectomy with intermittent pedicle occlusion (IPO) remains to be established. The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to compare the short-term outcome of hepatectomy using IPO with an ischaemic interval of 15 versus 30 min. Methods: Between October 2002 and September 2004, 108 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo hepatectomy without bilioenterostomy were enrolled. During liver transection, IPO was performed with an ischaemic interval of either 15 min with 5 min of reperfusion (standard group, SG) or 30 min with 5 min of reperfusion (prolonged group, PG). After randomization and subsequent exclusion of certain patients, 44 patients in the SG and 48 in the PG were analysed. Results: The mean(s.d.) bilirubin ratio (serum total bilirubin level on day 2 after operation divided by the preoperative level) was 1.6(0.8) in the SG and 1.7(0.8) in the PG (P = 0.874). The transection area per unit transection time was significantly greater in the latter group (median (range) 1.0 (0.4-2.1) versus 0.8 (0.0-1.5) cm(2)/min; P = 0.046). Conclusion: There was no difference in the bilirubin ratio when IPO was carried out for 30 or 15 min. By extension of IPO to 30 min, a greater resection area per unit time was possible with preservation of remnant liver function.
引用
收藏
页码:944 / 951
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection -: A controlled study [J].
Belghiti, J ;
Noun, R ;
Malafosse, R ;
Jagot, P ;
Sauvanet, A ;
Pierangeli, F ;
Marty, J ;
Farges, O .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 229 (03) :369-375
[2]
BELGHITI J, 1994, EUR J SURG, V160, P277
[3]
CAESAR J, 1961, CLIN SCI, V21, P43
[4]
Chiappa A, 2001, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V48, P1416
[5]
VASCULAR OCCLUSIONS FOR LIVER RESECTIONS - OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT AND TOLERANCE TO HEPATIC ISCHEMIA - 142 CASES [J].
DELVA, E ;
CAMUS, Y ;
NORDLINGER, B ;
HANNOUN, L ;
PARC, R ;
DERIAZ, H ;
LIENHART, A ;
HUGUET, C .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1989, 209 (02) :211-218
[6]
Grazi GL, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P1104
[7]
COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION DURING LIVER RESECTION IN AN EXPERIMENTAL-MODEL [J].
HARDY, KJ ;
TANCHEROEN, S ;
SHULKES, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (06) :833-836
[8]
MORTALITY, ENDOTOXEMIA AND CYTOKINE EXPRESSION AFTER INTERMITTENT AND CONTINUOUS HEPATIC ISCHEMIA [J].
HEWITT, G ;
HALLIDAY, I ;
MCCAIGUE, M ;
CAMPBELL, G ;
ROWLANDS, B ;
DIAMOND, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (10) :1424-1426
[9]
HUGUET C, 1992, SURGERY, V111, P251
[10]
HUGUET C, 1994, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V178, P454