What proportion of renewable energy supplies is needed to initially mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD member countries?

被引:172
作者
Chiu, Chien-Liang [2 ]
Chang, Ting-Huan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ind Technol Res Inst, Energy & Environm Res Labs, Hsinchu 310, Taiwan
[2] Tamkang Univ, Dept Banking & Finance, Taipei 251, Taiwan
关键词
Renewable energy; CO2; emissions; Real GDP; Energy price; Panel threshold regression model; CARBON-TAX; STRATEGIES; REDUCTION; IMPACT; POLICY; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In spite of increasing numbers of countries having established renewable energy development mechanisms for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction, the CO2 emissions problem continues to worsen along with the growth of the world economy. This leads us to examine the threshold effect of the proportion of renewable energy supply for CO2 emissions reduction by means of the panel threshold regression model (PTR). Economic growth and the price of energy are also both taken into account in the model in measuring the specific influence that each of them has on CO2 emissions. The empirical panel data encompass all 30 member countries of the OECD and cover a period of about a decade in length from 1996 to 2005. Our empirical results provide clear evidence of the existence of a single threshold effect that may be divided into lower and higher regimes. Based on the specific estimates of the slope coefficients in each regime distinguished, we find that a renewable energy supply accounting for at least 8.3889% of total energy supply would mean that CO2 emissions would start to be mitigated. Furthermore, real GDP and the CPI of energy are significantly and positively and insignificantly and negatively correlated with CO2 emissions, respectively. These findings lead us to conclude that the authorities ought to enhance the proportion of renewable energy supply to more than 8.3889% of all energy supplied, which might help resolve the dilemma between economic growth and CO2 emissions. Realizing the effects Of CO2 emissions reduction via energy price reforms or the levying of a carbon tax levy may, however, still remain a puzzle. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1669 / 1674
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis [J].
Agras, J ;
Chapman, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (02) :267-277
[2]   The Carbon-tax debate [J].
Al-Abdullah, AY .
APPLIED ENERGY, 1999, 64 (1-4) :3-13
[3]   Analytical procedure for carbon tax evaluation [J].
Borchiellini, R ;
Massardo, AF ;
Santarelli, M .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 41 (14) :1509-1531
[5]   Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis [J].
Coondoo, D ;
Dinda, S .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 40 (03) :351-367
[6]   Income and emission: A panel data-based cointegration analysis [J].
Dinda, Soumyananda ;
Coondoo, Dipankor .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) :167-181
[7]   How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement? [J].
Ekins, P .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (02) :161-187
[8]   Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model [J].
Fan, Y ;
Liu, LC ;
Wu, G ;
Wei, YM .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2006, 26 (04) :377-395
[9]   Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy [J].
Friedl, B ;
Getzner, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 45 (01) :133-148
[10]   Lower CO2 emissions through better technology [J].
Gessinger, G .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 :S25-S30