Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the US - The importance of tumor length and lymph node status

被引:326
作者
Eloubeidi, MA
Desmond, R
Arguedas, MR
Reed, CE
Wilcox, CM
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Biostat Unit, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ S Carolina, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
esophageal carcinoma; survival; tumor length; lymph node status;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.10868
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The current TNM classification system does not consider tumor length or the number of lymph nodes in the staging and classification scheme for patients with esophageal carcinoma. Using data from the National Cancer Institute SEER Program, the authors explored the effect of tumor length and number of positive lymph nodes on survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma. METHODS. Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were subgrouped according to historic stage with localized, regional, or distant disease. Demographic factors (age at diagnosis, race, and gender) and tumor characteristics (morphology, histologic grade, tumor length, primary site, depth of invasion, number of positive lymph nodes, proportion of positive lymph nodes dissected, and distant metastatic sites) were examined. RESULTS. Overall factors that were associated with an increased mortality risk included increasing age at diagnosis, black race versus white race, histologic grade, primary tumor site in the lower esophagus and abdomen versus upper regions, and increasing depth of invasion. Among patients with regional disease, the number of positive lymph nodes (greater than or equal to 5 vs. < 5) was related to an increasing risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.06-1.56). The proportion of positive lymph nodes compared with the number of lymph nodes dissected conferred an increased risk (HR, 1.63; 95%.CI, 1.26-2.11). Among patients with distant disease, sites other than distant lymph nodes implied an increased mortality risk (HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 1.37-1.65). Tumor length was an independent predictor of mortality when controlling for depth of invasion in patients with localized disease (HR, 1.15; 95%CI, 1.08-1.21). CONCLUSIONS. Tumor length, the number of involved lymph nodes, and the ratio of positive lymph nodes are important prognostic factors for survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma. A revised TNM classification system for patients with esophageal carcinoma might consider adding tumor length and number of positive lymph nodes as two important prognostic factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / 1443
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] *AM JOINT COMM CAN, 2000, AJCC CANC STAG MAN, P65
  • [2] RISING INCIDENCE OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AND GASTRIC CARDIA
    BLOT, WJ
    DEVESA, SS
    KNELLER, RW
    FRAUMENI, JF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (10): : 1287 - 1289
  • [3] CONTINUING CLIMB IN RATES OF ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA - AN UPDATE
    BLOT, WJ
    DEVESA, SS
    FRAUMENI, JF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (11): : 1320 - 1320
  • [4] Asa classification and lymph node extent at endosonography are independent predictive factors of survival of patients with esophageal cancer.
    Burtin, P
    Kaassis, M
    Aube, C
    Giovannini, M
    Di Stefano, D
    Arnaud, JP
    Cellier, P
    Boyer, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB119 - AB119
  • [5] M1A/M1B esophageal carcinoma: Clinical relevance
    Christie, NA
    Rice, TW
    DeCamp, MM
    Goldblum, JR
    Adelstein, DJ
    Zuccaro, G
    Rybicki, LA
    Blackstone, EH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 118 (05) : 900 - 906
  • [6] Predictors of survival for esophageal cancer patients with and without celiac axis lymphadenopathy: Impact of staging endosonography
    Eloubeidi, MA
    Wallace, MB
    Hoffman, BJ
    Leveen, MB
    Van Velse, A
    Hawes, RH
    Reed, CE
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (01) : 212 - 218
  • [7] Cancer statistics, 2001
    Greenlee, RT
    Hill-Harmon, MB
    Murray, T
    Thun, M
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2001, 51 (01) : 15 - 36
  • [8] IIZUKA T, 1985, JPN J CLIN ONCOL, V15, P625
  • [9] Proposed revision of the staging classification for esophageal cancer
    Korst, RJ
    Rusch, VW
    Venkatraman, E
    Bains, MS
    Burt, ME
    Downey, RJ
    Ginsberg, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (03) : 660 - 669
  • [10] Lightdale CJ, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P20