A comparison of time discretization schemes for two-timescale problems in geophysical fluid dynamics

被引:9
作者
Bartello, P [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
implicit; split explicit; linear propagator;
D O I
10.1006/jcph.2002.7056
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In many geophysical fluid modeling applications there exist two very different time scales, essentially fast waves and slow vortices. At the largest planetary scales inertial-gravity waves propagate through the fluid at phase speeds much faster than particle velocities. while at small scales fast acoustic modes coexist with much slower vortex motions. If numerical models are to be affordable in this context, schemes which do not explicitly resolve the fast motion must be devised. Although this has traditionally been done for strictly numerical reasons. the result is physically equivalent to a temporal sub-grid-scale model. Examples of such schemes examined here are the semi-implicit, split explicit, and linear-propagator methods. All of these methods fail to resolve the fast motion accurately. but in very different ways. Recent progress in the field of rotating stratified turbulence is employed on a simplified two-time-scale version of the Boussinesq equations in order to determine how well these schemes represent the evolution of the slow variables, It is found that the split explicit and linear-propagator methods exhibit spurious interactions between the slow modes and their numerically retarded fast modes in certain conditions when wDeltat is large. The semi-implicit method is able to maintain a frequency separation, but it mimics the true evolution best when time filtering is applied. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 285
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, NUMERICAL EXPT HOMOG
[2]  
ASSELIN R, 1972, MON WEATHER REV, V100, P487, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0487:FFFTI>2.3.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Bartello P, 1996, MON WEATHER REV, V124, P2883, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2883:TCEOSL>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Bartello P, 1995, J ATMOS SCI, V52, P4410, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<4410:GAAICI>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Bartello P, 1996, J ATMOS SCI, V53, P564, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<0564:GVWEVI>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
BROWNING GL, 1994, MON WEATHER REV, V122, P2614, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<2614:SMFPWD>2.0.CO