Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness

被引:223
作者
Ananny, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Annenberg Sch Commun & Journalism, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
ethics; information algorithms; networked technology; probability; similarity; automation; time; Internet; SOCIAL MEDIA; NEWS; DESIGN; POWER; WEB;
D O I
10.1177/0162243915606523
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Part of understanding the meaning and power of algorithms means asking what new demands they might make of ethical frameworks, and how they might be held accountable to ethical standards. I develop a definition of networked information algorithms (NIAs) as assemblages of institutionally situated code, practices, and norms with the power to create, sustain, and signify relationships among people and data through minimally observable, semiautonomous action. Starting from Merrill's prompt to see ethics as the study of what we ought to do, I examine ethical dimensions of contemporary NIAs. Specifically, in an effort to sketch an empirically grounded, pragmatic ethics of algorithms, I trace an algorithmic assemblage's power to convene constituents, suggest actions based on perceived similarity and probability, and govern the timing and timeframes of ethical action.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 117
页数:25
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
ANDERSON B., 1983, IMAGINED COMMUNITY
[2]  
Anderson C.W., 2011, International Journal of Communication, V5, P19
[3]  
[Anonymous], VENTURE BEAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1 MONDAY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ICWSM 2013
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AAAI C WEBL SOC MED
[7]  
[Anonymous], LIMN CROWDS CLOUDS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Washington Post
[10]  
[Anonymous], CONCLUSION POLITICS