Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin

被引:348
作者
Gong, Lebing
Xu, Chong-yu
Chen, Deliang
Halldin, Sven
Chen, Yongqin David
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Earth Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Beijing 100864, Peoples R China
[5] China Meteorol Adm, Lab Climate Studies, Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog & Resource Management, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration; sensitivity coefficient; Changjiang basin; China;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Sensitivity analysis is important in understanding the relative importance of climatic variables to the variation of reference evapotranspiration (ETref). In this study, a non-dimensional relative sensitivity coefficient was employed to predict responses of ETref to perturbations of four climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin. ETref was estimated with the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith equation. A 41-year historical dataset of daily air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and daily sunshine duration at 150 national meteorological observatory stations was used in the analysis. Results show that the response of ETref can be precisely predicted under perturbation of relative humidity or shortwave radiation by their sensitivity coefficients; the predictive power under perturbations of air temperature and wind speed depended on the magnitude of the perturbation, season and region. The prediction errors were much smaller than the seasonal and regional variation of their sensitivity coefficients. The sensitivity coefficient could also be used to predict the response of ETref to co-perturbation of several variables. The accuracy of the prediction increases from the lower to the upper region. Spatial variations of long-term average monthly and yearly sensitivity coefficients were obtained by interpolation of station estimates. In general, relative humidity was the most sensitive variable, followed by shortwave radiation, air temperature and wind speed. The actual rank of the four climatic variables in terms of their sensitivity varied with season and region. The large spatial variability of the sensitivity coefficients of all the climatic variables in the middle and tower regions of the basin was to a large extent determined by the distinct wind-speed patterns in those two regions. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 629
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   Sensitivity analysis and multi-response, multi-criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model [J].
Anderton, S ;
Latron, M ;
Gallart, F .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (02) :333-353
[3]   Plackett-Burman techniques for sensitivity analysis of many-parametered models [J].
Beres, DL ;
Hawkins, DM .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2001, 141 (1-3) :171-183
[4]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE PENMAN-MONTEITH ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES [J].
BEVEN, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1979, 44 (3-4) :169-190
[5]  
Blaney H.F., 1950, DETERMINING WATER RE, P48
[6]  
Burgman M.A., 1993, RISK ASSESSMENT CONS, P314
[7]   Comparison of the Thornthwaite method and pan data with the standard Penman-Monteith estimates of reference evapotranspiration in China [J].
Chen, DL ;
Gao, G ;
Xu, CY ;
Guo, J ;
Ren, GY .
CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2005, 28 (02) :123-132
[8]   SENSITIVITY AND MODEL VARIANCE ANALYSIS APPLIED TO SOME EVAPORATION AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MODELS [J].
COLEMAN, G ;
DECOURSEY, DG .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1976, 12 (05) :873-879
[9]   Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions [J].
Droogers, Peter ;
Allen, Richard G. .
2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers (16)
[10]  
DYCK S, 1983, IAHS PUBLICATION, V148, P3