Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty

被引:373
作者
Apel, H
Thieken, AH
Merz, B
Blöschl, G
机构
[1] Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam, Sect 5 4 Engn Hydrol, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Hydraul Hydrol & Water Resources Management, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Flood disaster mitigation strategies should be based on a comprehensive assessment of the flood risk combined with a thorough investigation of the uncertainties associated with the risk assessment procedure. Within the "German Research Network of Natural Disasters" (DFNK) the working, group "Flood Risk Analysis" investigated the flood process chain from precipitation, runoff generation and concentration in the catchment, flood routing, in the river network, possible failure of flood protection measures, inundation to economic damage. The working group represented each of these processes by deterministic, spatially distributed models at different scales. While these models provide the necessary understanding of the flood process chain, they are not suitable for risk and uncertainty analyses due to their complex nature and high CPU-time demand. We have therefore developed a stochastic flood risk model consisting of simplified model components associated with the components of the process chain. We parameterised these model components based on the results of the complex deterministic models and used them for the risk and uncertainty analysis in a Monte Carlo framework. The Monte Carlo framework is hierarchically structured in two layers representing two different sources of uncertainty, aleatory uncertainty (due to natural and anthropogenic variability) and epistemic uncertainty (due to incomplete knowledge of the system). The model allows us to calculate probabilities of occurrence for events of different magnitudes along with the expected economic damage in a tar-et area in the first layer of the Monte Carlo framework, i.e. to assess the economic risks, and to derive uncertainty bounds associated with these risks in the second layer. It is also possible to identify the contributions of individual sources of uncertainty to the overall uncertainty. It could be shown that the uncertainty caused by epistemic sources significantly alters the results obtained with aleatory uncertainty alone. The model was applied to reaches of the river Rhine downstream of Cologne.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 308
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] APEL H, 2004, NATURAL HAZARDS
  • [2] BERGA L, 1998, DAM SAFETY, P1099
  • [3] BOWLES DS, 1996, GEOTECHN SPEC PUBL, V58, P451
  • [4] The use of two-stage Monte Carlo simulation techniques to characterize variability and uncertainty in risk analysis
    Cohen, JT
    Lampson, MA
    Bowers, TS
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (04): : 939 - 971
  • [5] CULLEN AC, 1999, HDB DEALING VARIABIL, P335
  • [6] DISSE M, 2004, IN PRESS NATURAL HAZ
  • [7] Dyck S, 1995, GRUNDLAGEN HYDROLOGI, P536
  • [8] Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability
    Ferson, S
    Ginzburg, LR
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 54 (2-3) : 133 - 144
  • [9] GROTHMANN T, 2004, IN PRESS COPING FLOO
  • [10] Hall JW, 1998, HYDROINFORMATICS '98, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1101