The dust scattering model cannot explain the shallow X-ray decay in GRB afterglows

被引:19
作者
Shen, R. -F. [1 ]
Willingale, R. [2 ]
Kumar, P. [1 ]
O'Brien, P. T. [2 ]
Evans, P. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Astron, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Leicester, Dept Phys & Astron, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
基金
英国科学技术设施理事会;
关键词
radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; scattering; dust; extinction; gamma-rays: burst; SMALL-ANGLE SCATTERING; RELATIVISTIC WIND BUBBLES; BURST HOST GALAXIES; SWIFT XRT DATA; INTERSTELLAR DUST; ENERGY INJECTION; REVERSE SHOCK; LIGHT CURVES; MILKY-WAY; GRAINS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14223.x
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
A dust scattering model was recently proposed to explain the shallow X-ray decay (plateau) observed prevalently in Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) early afterglows. In this model, the plateau is the scattered prompt X-ray emission by the dust located close (about 10 to a few hundred pc) to the GRB site. In this paper, we carefully investigate the model and find that the scattered emission undergoes strong spectral softening with time, due to the model's essential ingredient that harder X-ray photons have smaller scattering angle thus arrive earlier, while softer photons suffer larger angle scattering and arrive later. The model predicts a significant change, that is Delta beta similar to 2-3, in the X-ray spectral index from the beginning of the plateau towards the end of the plateau, while the observed data show close to zero softening during the plateau and the plateau-to-normal transition phase. The scattering model predicts a big difference between the harder X-ray light curve and the softer X-ray light curve, i.e. the plateau in harder X-rays ends much earlier than in softer X-rays. This feature is not seen in the data. The large scattering optical depths of the dust required by the model imply strong extinction in optical, A(V) greater than or similar to 10, which contradicts current findings of A(V) = 0.1-0.7 from optical and X-ray afterglow observations. We conclude that the dust scattering model cannot explain the X-ray plateaus.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 606
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF SMALL-ANGLE SCATTERING ON A PULSE OF RADIATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF X-RAY BURSTS AND INTER-STELLAR DUST [J].
ALCOCK, C ;
HATCHETT, S .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 222 (02) :456-470
[2]  
BLOOM JS, 2005, 3758 GCN
[3]   X-ray hardness variations as an internal/external shock diagnostic [J].
Butler, Nathaniel R. ;
Kocevski, Daniel .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 668 (01) :400-408
[4]   Dust extinction of gamma-ray burst host galaxies: Identification of two classes? [J].
Chen, S. L. ;
Li, Aigen ;
Wei, D. M. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 647 (01) :L13-L16
[5]  
CUCCHIARA A, 2006, 4729 GCN
[6]   Relativistic wind bubbles and afterglow signatures [J].
Dai, ZG .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 606 (02) :1000-1005
[7]  
Dai ZG, 1998, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V333, pL87
[8]   γ-ray bursts and afterglows from rotating strange stars and neutron stars [J].
Dai, ZG ;
Lu, T .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 81 (20) :4301-4304
[9]   OPTICAL-PROPERTIES OF INTERSTELLAR GRAPHITE AND SILICATE GRAINS [J].
DRAINE, BT ;
LEE, HM .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 285 (01) :89-108
[10]   Direct extragalactic distance determination using X-ray scattering [J].
Draine, BT ;
Bond, NA .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 617 (02) :987-1003