共 1 条
New Approach to Stroke Subtyping: The A-S-C-O (Phenotypic) Classification of Stroke
被引:249
作者:
Amarenco, P.
[1
,2
,3
]
Bogousslavsky, J.
[4
]
Caplan, L. R.
[5
]
Donnan, G. A.
[6
]
Hennerici, M. G.
[7
]
机构:
[1] Hop Xavier Bichat, Dept Neurol, FR-75018 Paris, France
[2] Hop Xavier Bichat, Stroke Ctr, INSERM, U 698, FR-75018 Paris, France
[3] Paris Diderot Univ, Bichat Univ Hosp, Paris, France
[4] Genolier Swiss Med Network, Dept Neurol, Valmont Genolier, Glion Sur Montr, Switzerland
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cerebrovasc Stroke, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hlth, Natl Stroke Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Heidelberg, Univ Klinikum Mannheim, Dept Neurol, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
关键词:
Stroke;
Subtype;
Severity;
D O I:
10.1159/000210433
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
We now propose a new approach to stroke subtyping. The concept is to introduce a complete 'stroke phenotyping' classification (i.e. stroke etiology and the presence of all underlying diseases, divided by grade of severity) as distinguished from past classifications that subtype strokes by characterizing only the most likely cause(s) of stroke. In this phenotype-based classification, every patient is characterized by A-S-C-O: A for atherosclerosis, S for small vessel disease, C for cardiac source, O for other cause. Each of the 4 phenotypes is graded 1, 2, or 3. One for 'definitely a potential cause of the index stroke', 2 for 'causality uncertain', 3 for 'unlikely a direct cause of the index stroke (but disease is present)'. When the disease is completely absent, the grade is 0; when grading is not possible due to insufficient workup, the grade is 9. For example, a patient with a 70% ipsilateral symptomatic stenosis, leukoaraiosis, atrial fibrillation, and platelet count of 700,000/mm(3) would be classified as A1-S3-C1-O3. The same patient with a 70% ipsilateral stenosis, no brain imaging, normal ECG, and normal cardiac imaging would be identified as A1-S9-C0-O3. By introducing the 'level of diagnostic evidence', this classification recognizes the completeness, the quality, and the timing of the evaluation to grade the underlying diseases. Diagnostic evidence is graded in levels A, B, or C: A for direct demonstration by gold-standard diagnostic tests or criteria, B for indirect evidence or less sensitive or specific tests or criteria, and C for weak evidence in the absence of specific tests or criteria. With this new way of classifying patients, no information is neglected when the diagnosis is made, treatment can be adapted to the observed phenotypes and the most likely etiology (e.g. grade 1 in 1 of the 4 A-S-C-O phenotypes), and analyses in clinical research can be based on 1 of the 4 phenotypes (e. g. for genetic analysis purpose), while clinical trials can focus on 1 or several of these 4 phenotypes (e. g. focus on patients A1- A2-A3). Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 508
页数:7
相关论文