Intraocular pressure variations after diode laser photocoagulation for threshold retinopathy of prematurity

被引:15
作者
Axer-Siegel, R
Bourla, D
Friling, R
Shalev, B
Sirota, L
Benjamini, Y
Weinberger, D
Snir, M
机构
[1] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, IL-49100 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Schneider Childrens Med Ctr Israel, Neonatol Intens Care Unit, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Exact Sci, Dept Stat, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Schneider Childrens Med Ctr Israel, Pediat Ophthalmol Unit, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.024
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) variations occurring after indirect diode laser photocoagulation for threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study. Participants: A study group-21 consecutive premature babies (42 eyes) undergoing diode laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity-and control groups-32 premature babies (64 eyes) undergoing retinal examination with or without scleral indentation. Intervention: Intraocular pressure was measured with a portable electronic tonometer before, immediately after, and 1, 2, and 3 days after diode laser photocoagulation in the study group; before retinal examination in control group 1; and before and after retinal examination with scleral indentation in control group 2. Main Outcome Measure: Intraocular pressure after diode laser photocoagulation for threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Results: Mean IOP in the study group rose from 15 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] = 4.1) before coagulation to 33.2 mmHg (SD = 7.8; range, 20-50) immediately after, and then dropped to 22.2 (SD = 5.2), 16.5 (SD = 3), and 14.5 mmHg (SD = 2.1) 1, 2, and 3 days later, respectively. All the changes were statistically significant at P<0.0001, except for the difference between days 2 and 3 (P = 0.096). Mean baseline IOPs were 16.3 mmHg (SD = 3.7) in control group 1 and 15.7 mmHg (SD = 2.3) in control group 2 (P = 0.84 between control group 1 and study group, and P = 0.32 between control group 2 and the study group). At termination of the retinal examination with scleral indentation (control group 2), IOP measured 15.1 mmHg (SD = 2.2) (P = 0.49 compared with baseline). Conclusions: Intraocular pressure may be significantly elevated after diode laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity. The mechanism and long-term clinical implications of this observation should be investigated. (C) 2004 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1734 / 1738
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Diode laser treatment of posterior retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Axer-Siegel, R ;
Snir, M ;
Cotlear, D ;
Maayan, A ;
Frilling, R ;
Rosenbaltt, I ;
Weinberger, D ;
Kremer, I ;
Sirota, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (12) :1383-1386
[2]   THE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE OF PREMATURE INFANTS [J].
BROCKHURST, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1955, 39 (06) :808-811
[3]   Clinical outcome of confluent laser photoablation for retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Fallaha, N ;
Lynn, MJ ;
Aaberg, TM ;
Lambert, SR .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2002, 6 (02) :81-85
[4]  
Huamonte F U, 1976, Ophthalmic Surg, V7, P88
[5]  
Kaiser RS, 2001, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V119, P615
[6]   Stress induced by screening for retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Kumar, H ;
Nainiwal, S ;
Singha, U ;
Azad, R ;
Paul, VK .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2002, 39 (06) :349-350
[7]  
Lee G A, 1998, J AAPOS, V2, P383, DOI 10.1016/S1091-8531(98)90042-8
[8]   REDUCTION OF IMMEDIATE COMPLICATIONS AFTER PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION [J].
LIANG, JC ;
HUAMONTE, FU .
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 1984, 4 (03) :166-170
[9]  
MUSARELLA M A, 1985, Metabolic Pediatric and Systemic Ophthalmology, V8, P53
[10]   A comparison of laser photocoagulation with cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy of prematurity at 10 years - Part 1. Visual function and structural outcome [J].
Ng, EYJ ;
Connolly, BP ;
McNamara, JA ;
Regillo, CD ;
Vander, JF ;
Tasman, W .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (05) :928-934