A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing

被引:636
作者
Diks, Cees [1 ]
Panchenko, Valentyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, CeNDEF, Dept Econ, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
financial time series; Granger causality; nonparametric; hypothesis testing; size distortion; U-statistics;
D O I
10.1016/j.jedc.2005.08.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we introduce a new nonparametric test for Granger non-causality which avoids the over-rejection observed in the frequently used test proposed by Hiemstra and Jones [1994. Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation. Journal of Finance 49, 1639-1664]. After illustrating the problem by showing that rejection probabilities under the null hypothesis may tend to one as the sample size increases, we study the reason behind this phenomenon analytically. It turns out that the Hiemstra-Jones test for the null of Granger non-causality, which can be rephrased in terms of conditional independence of two vectors X and Z given a third vector Y, is sensitive to variations in the conditional distributions of X and Z that may be present under the null. To overcome this problem we replace the global test statistic by an average of local conditional dependence measures. By letting the bandwidth tend to zero at appropriate rates, the variations in the conditional distributions are accounted for automatically. Based on asymptotic theory we formulate practical guidelines for choosing the bandwidth depending on the sample size. We conclude with an application to historical returns and trading volumes of the Standard and Poor's index which indicates that the evidence for volume Granger-causing returns is weaker than suggested by the Hiemstra-Jones test. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1647 / 1669
页数:23
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Abhyankar A, 1998, J FUTURES MARKETS, V18, P519, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199808)18:5<519::AID-FUT2>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-U
[3]  
Baek E., 1992, GEN TEST GRANGER CAU
[4]   A non-parametric approach to non-linear causality testing [J].
Bell, D ;
Kay, J ;
Malley, J .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 51 (01) :7-18
[5]  
Broock WA., 1996, ECONOMET REV, V15, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07474939608800353, DOI 10.1080/2F07474939608800353.NUME]
[6]  
Brooks C, 1998, J FORECASTING, V17, P59, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199801)17:1<59::AID-FOR676>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-8
[8]   Cointegration and detectable linear and nonlinear causality: analysis using the London Metal Exchange lead contract [J].
Chen, AS ;
Lin, JW .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (11) :1157-1167
[9]   Energy shocks and financial markets: Nonlinear linkages [J].
Ciner, C .
STUDIES IN NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, 2001, 5 (03) :203-212
[10]   ON U-STATISTICS AND V MISES STATISTICS FOR WEAKLY DEPENDENT PROCESSES [J].
DENKER, M ;
KELLER, G .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WAHRSCHEINLICHKEITSTHEORIE UND VERWANDTE GEBIETE, 1983, 64 (04) :505-522