Accuracy and safety of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: An experimental prospective randomized study

被引:52
作者
Lanvin, D
Elhage, A
Henry, B
Leblanc, E
Querleu, D
DelobelleDeroide, A
机构
[1] UNIV LILLE 1,FAC MED,DEPT HOSP UNIV RECH EXPT,F-59000 LILLE,FRANCE
[2] CTR OSCAR LAMBRET,F-59020 LILLE,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1997.4823
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction. The goal of this study was to investigate the accuracy and safety of bilateral pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy performed via transperitoneal laparoscopy (LS) compared to laparotomy (LT) in a porcine model. Materials and methods. Fifteen adult, female hogs underwent LS and 15 underwent LT. A complete pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed in each animal by an experienced surgeon. Lymph nodes were counted by a pathologist in each case. Operative times were reviewed and included all procedures performed. The intraoperative complications were noted. Four weeks after the lymphadenectomy, the animals underwent exploratory laparotomy, and intraperitoneal adhesions were quantified. Results. Thirty animals were evaluable. The average total number of lymph nodes retrieved by LS was 16.9 +/- 3.8, which was not statistically (P = 0.77) different from 16.5 +/- 4.9 nodes in LT. The average operating time in LT was 60 +/- 16 min compared with 128 +/- 24 min in LS. Twenty-eight animals were evaluable for adhesion formation. The average adhesion scores observed in anterior abdominal wall (P = 0.0006), paraaortic (P = 0.0005), right (P = 0.015), and left (P = 0.0324) iliac areas after LS were uniformly lower than after LT. Discussion. This study indicates that laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy is a safe and effective procedure. The node yield is similar for both approaches. The transperitoneal laparoscopy pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy may not induce the degree of adhesion formation associated with laparotomy. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 87
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - RISK VERSUS BENEFIT [J].
BRENDLER, CB ;
CLEEVE, LK ;
ANDERSON, EE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (06) :849-850
[2]   THE ROLE OF LAPAROSCOPIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL-CARCINOMA [J].
CHILDERS, JM ;
HATCH, K ;
SURWIT, EA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 47 (01) :38-43
[3]  
DARGENT D, 1993, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN, V5, P294
[4]  
DIAMOND M P, 1987, Microsurgery, V8, P197, DOI 10.1002/micr.1920080406
[5]   CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - PERCUTANEOUS LYMPH-NODE ASPIRATION BIOPSY [J].
EDEIKENMONROE, BS ;
ZORNOZA, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 138 (04) :655-657
[6]   CORRELATION OF RADIATION AND SURGICAL PARAMETERS IN COMPLICATIONS IN THE EXTENDED FIELD TECHNIQUE FOR CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
ELSENOUSSI, MA ;
FLETCHER, GH ;
BORLASE, BC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1979, 5 (07) :927-934
[7]   PELVIC ADHESION FORMATION AFTER PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY - COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPY AND EXTRAPERITONEAL LAPAROTOMY IN A PORCINE MODEL [J].
FOWLER, JM ;
HARTENBACH, EM ;
REYNOLDS, HT ;
BORNER, J ;
CARTER, JR ;
CARLSON, JW ;
TWIGGS, LB ;
CARSON, LF .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 55 (01) :25-28
[8]   IS PROPHYLACTIC PARA-AORTIC IRRADIATION WORTHWHILE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED CERVICAL-CARCINOMA - RESULTS OF A CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE EORTC RADIOTHERAPY GROUP [J].
HAIE, C ;
PEJOVIC, MH ;
GERBAULET, A ;
HORIOT, JC ;
POURQUIER, H ;
DELOUCHE, J ;
HEINZ, JF ;
BRUNE, D ;
FENTON, J ;
PIZZI, G ;
BEY, P ;
BROSSEL, R ;
PILLEMENT, P ;
VOLTERRANI, F ;
CHASSAGNE, D .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 11 (02) :101-112
[9]   SURGICAL STAGING OF CERVICAL-CANCER [J].
HEAPS, JM ;
BEREK, JS .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 33 (04) :852-863
[10]  
HENRYBUISSON B, 1995, THESIS U LILLE LILLE