Reconsidering environmental policy: Prescriptive consequentialism and volitional pragmatism

被引:41
作者
Bromley, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
collective action; consequentialism; environmental policy; pragmatism; volitional pragmatism;
D O I
10.1023/B:EARE.0000023821.33379.b7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Prescriptive consequentialism informs current assessments of rational action in economics. Choice is alleged to start with stable and known preferences over alternative outcomes, and rational agents choose actions that maximize well being with respect to these preferences. Evidence suggests that this formulation fails as an accurate and reliable description of how individuals make choices, and this formulation seems particularly at odds with collective decision making with respect to environmental policy. Pragmatism, an important branch of philosophy, offers a theory of human action that economists would find helpful. This promise is especially pertinent to efforts devoted to the assignment of values to parts of nature, and to environmental policy in general.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 99
页数:27
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
AKERLOF GA, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P307
[2]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[3]   Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing [J].
Alpay, E ;
Buccola, S ;
Kerkvliet, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :887-901
[4]   When green isn't mean: economic theory and the heuristics of the impact of environmental regulations on competitiveness and opportunity cost [J].
Altman, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (01) :31-44
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DESCARTES ERROR
[6]  
[Anonymous], COMPLEXITY VISION TE
[7]  
[Anonymous], INT YB ENV EC 1998 1
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1957, ESSAYS PHILOS SCI
[9]   Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? [J].
Arrow, KJ ;
Cropper, ML ;
Eads, GC ;
Hahn, RW ;
Lave, LB ;
Noll, RG ;
Portney, PR ;
Russell, M ;
Schmalensee, R ;
Smith, VK ;
Stavins, RN .
SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5259) :221-222
[10]   A REVIEW ARTICLE - THE CASE AGAINST THE USE OF THE SUM OF COMPENSATING VARIATIONS IN COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS [J].
BLACKORBY, C ;
DONALDSON, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1990, 23 (03) :471-494