Mapping supply chains on risk and customer sensitivity dimensions

被引:104
作者
Faisal, Mohd Nishat [1 ]
Banwet, D. K. [1 ]
Shankar, Ravi [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Management Studies, New Delhi, India
关键词
supply chain management; risk management; consumer behaviour;
D O I
10.1108/02635570610671533
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - With the emergence of the concepts of lean, agile and leagile paradigms for supply chains, organizations have little idea as to which model suits them based on the their supply chain's ability to counter risks and take on the challenges of the fast changing customer preferences. This paper aims to map supply chains on these two dimensions. Design/methodology/approach - A model is proposed by which suitable supply chain strategy can be selected based on customer sensitivity and risk alleviation competency dimension. Graph theoretic approach is applied to quantify these dimensions for three case supply chains. Findings - The proposed model was tested for three Indian SMEs clusters and suitable supply chain strategy was suggested. Research limitations/implications - It is recommended that the model be tested for those supply chains which have established themselves as lean, agile or leagile entities. Practical implications - Suggested model would help organizations to select suitable supply chain strategy based on customer sensitivity and risk alleviation competency and the transition required in tune with the market requirements in which they operate. Also the areas which need improvements from the perspective of risk alleviation competency or customer sensitivity can be easily delineated. Originality/value - Mapping supply chains based on quantification of customer sensitivity and risk alleviation competency dimension is a novel effort in the area of supply chain management.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 895
页数:18
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
AGARWAL A, 2005, EUROPEAN J OPERATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], MANAGE DECISION, DOI [10.1108/00251740010326342, DOI 10.1108/00251740010326342]
[3]  
Bandyopadhyay K., 1999, Management Decision, V37, P437, DOI 10.1108/00251749910274216
[4]  
Beamon B., 1999, LOGISTICS INFORM MAN, V12, DOI [10.1108/09576059910284159, DOI 10.1108/09576059910284159]
[5]   Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods [J].
Beamon, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1998, 55 (03) :281-294
[6]   Analysis and evaluation of e-supply chain performances [J].
Caputo, AC ;
Cucchiella, F ;
Fratocchi, L ;
Pelagagge, PM ;
Scacchia, F .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2004, 104 (07) :546-557
[7]   Supply chain management in theory and practice: a passing fad or a fundamental change? [J].
Chandra, C ;
Kumar, S .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2000, 100 (3-4) :100-113
[8]   Analysis of a supply chain partnership with revenue sharing [J].
Chauhan, SS ;
Proth, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2005, 97 (01) :44-51
[9]   Intention to e-collaborate: propagation of research propositions [J].
Cheng, Eddie W. L. ;
Love, Peter E. D. ;
Standing, Craig ;
Gharavi, Hosein .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2006, 106 (1-2) :139-152
[10]   Information flow in automotive supply chains - identifying and learning to overcome barriers to change [J].
Childerhouse, P ;
Hermiz, R ;
Mason-Jones, R ;
Popp, A ;
Towill, DR .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2003, 103 (07) :491-502