What happens to patients undergoing lung cancer surgery? Outcomes and quality of life before and after surgery

被引:218
作者
Handy, JR
Asaph, JW
Skokan, L
Reed, CE
Koh, S
Brooks, G
Douville, EC
Tsen, AC
Ott, GY
Silvestri, GA
机构
[1] Oregon Clin, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Portland, OR 97213 USA
[2] Providence Portland Med Ctr, Earle A Chiles Res Inst, Portland, OR USA
[3] Providence Hlth Syst, Ctr Outcomes Res & Educ, Portland, OR USA
[4] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[6] Med Univ S Carolina, Ctr Hlth Care Res, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
functional health status; lung cancer surgery; outcomes; quality of life;
D O I
10.1378/chest.122.1.21
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare baseline preoperative and 6-month postoperative functional health status and quality of life in patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Methods: Lung cancer surgery patients from three hospitals were administered the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the Ferrans and Powers' quality-of-life index (QLI) before surgery and 6 months after surgery. Preoperative, intraoperative, hospital stay, and 6-month postoperative clinical data were collected. All p values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. Results: One hundred thirty-nine patients were studied; 131 patients were discharged and 8 patients (5.8%) died. One hundred three patients (78.6%) who survived underwent an evaluation at 6 months, 16 patients (12.2%) died during follow-up, 2 patients refused follow-up, 4 patients were unavailable for follow-up, and 6 patients are awaiting an evaluation at 6 months. Compared with matched healthy subjects, preoperative lung cancer patients had worse results on the SF-36 physical functioning, role-emotional, mental health, and energy subscales. At 6 months, SF-36 subscales for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and mental health were significantly worse than preoperative values. The visual analog pain scale was significantly worse at follow-up. The QLI with all subscales and SF-36 for role-emotional, energy, and general health subscales were unaffected by lung cancer resection. Whereas preoperative FEV1 and 6-min walk results did not predict postoperative functional health status or QLI, a low preoperative diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) predicted poor postoperative QLI. Preoperative chemoradiation, extent of resection, postoperative complications, or adjuvant therapy did not negatively affect the results of the 6-month QLI or SF-36. Conclusions: Preoperative functional health status in patients who undergo lung cancer surgery is significantly impaired. A significant number of patients die during the 6 months after surgery. Pain and impairment of functional health status persists for 6 months after lung cancer resection. DLCO, not FEV1, predicts postoperative quality of life. Preoperative chemoradiation, extent of resection, postoperative complications, or adjuvant therapy do not adversely affect functional health status or quality of life 6 months after surgery. Future studies should focus on risk prediction, technical improvements, and postoperative intervention to improve the functional outcomes and quality of life after lung cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 30
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Median sternotomy versus thoracotomy to resect primary lung cancer: Analysis of 815 cases [J].
Asaph, JW ;
Handy, JR ;
Grunkemeier, GL ;
Douville, EC ;
Tsen, AC ;
Rogers, RC ;
Keppel, JF .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (02) :373-379
[2]   Patient preferences regarding possible outcomes of lung resection - What outcomes should preoperative evaluations target? [J].
Cykert, S ;
Kissling, G ;
Hansen, CJ .
CHEST, 2000, 117 (06) :1551-1559
[3]   PREOPERATIVE PREDICTION OF PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING THORACIC-SURGERY [J].
DALES, RE ;
DIONNE, G ;
LEECH, JA ;
LUNAU, M ;
SCHWEITZER, I .
CHEST, 1993, 104 (01) :155-159
[4]   OPTIMIZING CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY INFORMATION FOR A MANAGED CARE ENVIRONMENT [J].
DENTON, TA ;
MATLOFF, JM .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1995, 60 (05) :1522-1525
[5]  
FERGUSON MK, 1988, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V96, P894
[6]  
Ferrans C E, 1990, Oncol Nurs Forum, V17, P15
[7]   Cancer statistics, 2000 [J].
Greenlee, RT ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2000, 50 (01) :7-33
[8]  
Hendriks J, 1996, ACTA CHIR BELG, V96, P273
[9]   FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ITS PLACE IN HEALTH-CARE [J].
IKEGAMI, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (09) :598-599
[10]  
KEARNEY DJ, 1994, CHEST, V105, P753, DOI 10.1378/chest.105.3.753