Does Customer Demotion Jeopardize Loyalty?

被引:196
作者
Wagner, Tillmann [1 ]
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten [2 ]
Rudolph, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Rawls Coll Business, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Dept Mkt & Media Res, Weimar, Germany
[3] Univ St Gallen, Inst Mkt & Retailing, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
loyalty programs; customer demotion; customer loyalty; prospect theory; relationship marketing; ORGANIZATIONAL SUCCESSION; BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES; ATTRIBUTIONAL APPROACH; CONSUMER REACTIONS; STATUS DEGRADATION; BRAND LOYALTY; PROGRAMS; MODELS; MOTIVATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.73.3.69
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Hierarchical loyalty programs award elevated customer status (e.g., "elite membership") to consumers who meet a predefined spending level. However, if a customer subsequently falls short of the required spending level, firms commonly revoke that status. The authors investigate the impact of such customer demotion on loyalty intentions toward the firm. Building on prospect theory and emotions theory, the authors hypothesize that changes in customer status have an asymmetric negative effect, such that the negative impact of customer demotion is stronger than the positive impact of status increases. An experimental scenario study provides evidence that loyalty intentions are indeed lower for demoted customers than for those who have never been awarded a preferred status, meaning that hierarchical loyalty programs can drive otherwise loyal customers away from a firm. A field study using proprietary sales data from a different industry context demonstrates the robustness of the negative impact of customer demotion. The authors test the extent to which design variables of hierarchical loyalty programs may attenuate the negative consequences of status demotions with a second experimental scenario study and present an analytical model that links status demotion to customer equity to aid managerial decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 85
页数:17
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Curvilinear effects of consumer loyalty determinants in relational exchanges [J].
Agustin, C ;
Singh, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (01) :96-108
[2]  
[Anonymous], RES CONSUM BEHAV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Review of personality and social psychology, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781483325333.N2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J MARKETING
[5]   SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF RIGOROUS RESEARCH [J].
ARGYRIS, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1968, 70 (3P1) :185-&
[6]  
Bagozzi RichardP., 1994, Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, P1
[7]  
BERGER PD, 1998, J INTERACT MARK, V12, P17
[9]   A dynamic model of customers' usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction [J].
Bolton, RN ;
Lemon, KN .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (02) :171-186
[10]   Angry customers don't come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services [J].
Bougie, R ;
Pieters, R ;
Zeelenberg, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2003, 31 (04) :377-393