Enhancing SCORM metadata for assessment authoring in e-Learning

被引:21
作者
Chang, WC
Hsu, HH
Smith, TK
Wang, CC
机构
[1] Tamkang Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Multimedia Informat NEtwork Lab, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Kuang Wu Inst Technol, Dept Informat Management, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
assessment; cognition level analysis; e-Learning; metadata;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00091.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of distance learning and the XML technology, metadata play an important role in e-Learning. Nowadays, many distance learning standards, such as SCORM, AICC CMI, IEEE LTSC LOM and IMS, use metadata to tag learning materials. However, most metadata models are used to define learning materials and test problems. Few metadata models are dedicated to assessment. In this paper, the authors propose an assessment metadata model for e-Learning operations. With support from assessment metadata, we can incorporate measured aspects of the following list into the metadata description at the question cognition level, the item difficulty index, the item discrimination index, the questionnaire style and the question style. The assessment analysis model provides analytical suggestions for individual questions, summary of test results and cognition analysis. Analytical suggestions provide teachers information about why a question is not appropriate. Summary of test results improves the teacher's view of student learning status immediately. Items missing from the teaching materials can be identified by cognition analysis. In this research, the authors propose an enhanced metadata model and an implemented system based on our model. With metadata support, metadata can help teachers in authoring examination.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 316
页数:12
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ANDERSON Y, 2001, IMS CONTENT PACKAGIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1956, CLASSIFICATION ED GO
[3]  
Dodds P, 2001, SHARABLE CONTENT OBJ
[4]  
FLEISHNAN EA, 1984, TAXONOMIES HUMAN PER
[5]  
HODGINS W, 2001, DRAFT STANDARD LEARN
[6]   The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items [J].
Kelley, TL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1939, 30 :17-24
[7]   VALIDATION OF TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES [J].
KROPP, RP ;
STOKER, HW ;
BASHAW, WL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1966, 34 (03) :69-76
[8]  
SEDDON GM, 1978, REV EDUC RES, V48, P303, DOI 10.3102/00346543048002303