Effect of patient socioeconomic status on physician profiles for prevention, disease management, and diagnostic testing costs

被引:53
作者
Franks, P
Fiscella, K
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Dept Community & Prevent Med, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
profiling; benchmarking; quality indicators; physician practice patterns; socioeconomic factors;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-200208000-00011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND. Previous research shows patient socioeconomic status (SES) affects physician profiles for health status and satisfaction, but effects on other aspects of care are not known. OBJECTIVE. To examine the effect of patient SES on physician profiles for preventive care, disease management, and diagnostic testing costs. RESEARCH DESIGN. Cross-sectional analysis of a managed care claims data. SUBJECTS. Five hundred sixty-eight physicians and 600,618 patients. MEASURES. Patient age, gender, case-mix, and SES based on zip code, likelihood of having a Papanicolaou smear, mammogram, for diabetics having had a glycosylated hemoglobin, diabetic eye exam, and diagnostic testing costs. RESULTS. For each performance indicator, except glycosylated hemoglobin, there was a statistically significant effect of adjusting for patient SES. For diabetic eye checks, mammograms and Papanicolaou tests respectively, 5%, 16%, and 21% of physicians who were outliers (in the top or bottom 5% of rankings) were no longer outliers after socioeconomic adjustment. For all performance measures the change in physician ranking was strongly correlated with the mean practice SES. CONCLUSIONS. Patient SES, as measured by zip code, appreciably affects physician profiles for preventive care and diabetes management. Monitoring patient SES using patient zip codes could be used to target resources to improve outcomes for higher risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 724
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANN M POL METH GROUP
[2]  
Avants SK, 2001, AM J ADDICTION, V10, P69
[3]  
BARRON WM, 1980, PRIMARY CARE, V7, P563
[4]   Patients and community together - A family medicine community-oriented primary care project in an urban private practice [J].
Bayer, WH ;
Fiscella, K .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1999, 8 (06) :546-549
[5]  
Bean A G, 1992, J Health Care Mark, V12, P14
[6]   THE KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF SCREENING-TESTS FOR COLORECTAL AND PROSTATE-CANCER - DATA FROM THE 1987 NATIONAL-HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY [J].
BROWN, ML ;
POTOSKY, AL ;
THOMPSON, GB ;
KESSLER, LG .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1990, 19 (05) :562-574
[7]   Medical profiling: improving standards and risk adjustments using hierarchical models [J].
Burgess, JF ;
Christiansen, CL ;
Michalak, SE ;
Morris, CN .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2000, 19 (03) :291-309
[8]   Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling [J].
Christiansen, CL ;
Morris, CN .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (08) :764-768
[9]   Health care policy - Outcomes research: Measuring the end results of health care [J].
Clancy, CM ;
Eisenberg, JM .
SCIENCE, 1998, 282 (5387) :245-246
[10]   Community health centers: Promise and performance [J].
Dievler, A ;
Giovannini, T .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 1998, 55 (04) :405-431