Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking

被引:180
作者
Jain, Ajay N.
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Canc Res Inst, Dept Biopharmaceut Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Lab Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
docking; scoring; free energy; PMF; machine learning; Surflex; Glide; GOLD;
D O I
10.2174/138920306778559395
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Virtual screening by molecular docking has become established as a method for drug lead discovery and optimization. All docking algorithms make use of a scoring function in combination with a method of search. Two theoretical aspects of scoring function performance dominate operational performance. The first is the degree to which a scoring function has a global extremum within the ligand pose landscape at the proper location. The second is the degree to which the magnitude of the function at the extremum is accurate. Presuming adequate search strategies, a scoring function's location performance will dominate behavior with respect to docking accuracy: the degree to which a predicted pose of a ligand matches experimental observation. A scoring function's magnitude performance will dominate behavior with respect to screening utility: enrichment of true ligands over non-ligands. Magnitude estimation also controls pure scoring accuracy: the degree to which bona fide ligands of a particular protein may be correctly ranked. Approaches to the development of scoring functions have varied widely, with a number of functions yielding similarly high levels of performance relating to the location issue. However, even among functions performing equally well on location, widely varying performance is observed on the question of magnitude. In many cases, performance is good enough to yield high enrichments of true ligands versus non-ligands in screening across a wide variety of protein types. Generally, performance is not good enough to correctly rank among true ligands. Strategies for improvement are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 420
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations
    Bissantz, C
    Folkers, G
    Rognan, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (25) : 4759 - 4767
  • [3] Informative library design as an efficient strategy to identify and optimize leads: Application to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 antagonists
    Bradley, EK
    Miller, JL
    Saiah, E
    Grootenhuis, PDJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 46 (20) : 4360 - 4364
  • [4] Model for aqueous solvation based on class IV atomic charges and first solvation shell effects
    Chambers, CC
    Hawkins, GD
    Cramer, CJ
    Truhlar, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 100 (40) : 16385 - 16398
  • [5] Empirical scoring functions .1. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes
    Eldridge, MD
    Murray, CW
    Auton, TR
    Paolini, GV
    Mee, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1997, 11 (05) : 425 - 445
  • [6] DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases
    Ewing, TJA
    Makino, S
    Skillman, AG
    Kuntz, ID
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (05) : 411 - 428
  • [7] Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy
    Friesner, RA
    Banks, JL
    Murphy, RB
    Halgren, TA
    Klicic, JJ
    Mainz, DT
    Repasky, MP
    Knoll, EH
    Shelley, M
    Perry, JK
    Shaw, DE
    Francis, P
    Shenkin, PS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) : 1739 - 1749
  • [8] A new class of models for computing receptor-ligand binding affinities
    Gilson, MK
    Given, JA
    Head, MS
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (02): : 87 - 92
  • [9] Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions
    Gohlke, H
    Hendlich, M
    Klebe, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 295 (02) : 337 - 356
  • [10] Goodsell DS, 1996, J MOL RECOGNIT, V9, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199601)9:1<1::AID-JMR241>3.0.CO